“EVALION” RALLY POSTPONED DUE TO THREATS AGAINST HER PERSONAL SAFETY BY “PEDOPHILE” GROUPS

Unfortunately, due to threats from groups controlled and/or funded by ZioMarxist entities, Evalion’s rally at the Your Ward News office on November 22, 2016, will be postponed to a new date and new venue, announced only to a select group of people on a mailing list (the event time and location will not be made public).  The reason for the postponement and change of venue is to counter threats to Evalion’s personal safety.

014

According to Evalion, who is a strong anti-Pedophilia advocate, entities representing “Pedophiles”, a gentleman by the surname of “Picciolini” (who may or may not be part of this Pedophile group), and potential Pedophile operatives in “Antifa”, were planning on “ambushing” her at the event.  We regret any inconvenience caused by this postponement, but we trust that the community will support us in ensuring the safety of this young Nationalist videographer.

The Witch Hunt against those speaking out against Zionism – is to move up a gear in Britain — An Appeal from Lady Michele Renouf

The Witch Hunt against those speaking out against Zionism – is to move up a gear in Britain — An Appeal from Lady Michele Renouf

Christmas 2006 012

‘The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism’ plans to make its up its aggressive campaign at closing down all opposition to the Zionist Supremacy.  This is similar to what happens in France where wealthy Zionist ‘charities’ fund the legal persecution of anyone who shows the least sign of anti-zionism.
If anyone can find out the venue of this ‘recruitment drive’ do let us know and we will send someone along to monitor them and to ensure they don’t indulge in any hate speech against gentiles.
Remember this is the organisation that boasts about getting patriots sacked from their jobs and getting an 86 year old pensioner fined for using the word ‘Shylock’.

Free Speech Smashed in England; Pensioner Fined $1,000 for Calling Blockbuster Developer “Shylock”

Free Speech Smashed in  England; Pensioner Fined $1,000 for Calling Blockbuster Developer “Shylock”

86-YEAR-OLD ANTISEMITE CONVICTED AND ORDERED TO PAY £640 AFTER CALLING JEWISH BUSINESSMEN “SHYLOCK”

haringey-civic-centre

86-year-old Herminio Martinez has been convicted for racially aggravated threatening behaviour after launching into an antisemitic tirade on 8th February following a city planning meeting at which Jewish businessmen were permitted to construct a block of flats.

Property developers Michael and Joseph Gerrard were leaving the city planning at Haringey Civic Centre when Mr Martinez, who had opposed the planning application, called Michael Gerrard “Shylock”, a reference to the Jewish moneylender in Shakespeare’s play The Merchant of Venice who famously demands a “pound of flesh” in settlement of a debt.

Mr Martinez denied the offence, but the magistrates convicted him on the basis of video footage of the aftermath of the incident filmed on a smartphone, handing him a 12-month conditional discharge and ordering him to pay £625 prosecution costs and a £15 victim surcharge.

We commend the victims for taking action to ensure that this racist was punished.

Regrettably such convictions are rare due to reluctance on the part of the Crown Prosecution Service to take action against antisemites. While 2015 saw the worst level of antisemitic hate crime on record, we only know of 12 cases of antisemitic hate crime that the Crown Prosecution Service prosecuted, out of a total of 15,442 hate crimes prosecuted that year.

For Our American Friends: Call Your Congressman to Oppose Latest Zionist Effort to Squelch Criticism Of Holocaust Story

For Our American Friends: Call Your Congressman to Oppose Latest Zionist Effort to Squelch Criticism Of Holocaust Story

This is a “sense of the Congress” resolution which would throw the moral authority of the U.S. government against any questioning of the so-called holocaust or criticism of Jews or Israel. This is an utter betrayal of freedom of speech and freedom of thought. If anything illustrates the power of the Jewish lobby in the U.S. (something the windy definition of anti-semitism includes as “anti-semitic”  accusing :” Jews [of] controlling the media, economy, government,

THANKS TO JOE RIZOLI, who made us aware of this (below), we can contact our Reps in Congress.  So all of you Americans on this list, please locate your rep, email and then call him.  This HR BILL is appalling for the reasons I mentioned below.  In this new awakening, you might say, from the Trump administration that is about to be installed, we need to take responsibility for the actions of our out-of-control reps, senators, etc. They need to know how we feel (one of our shortcomings from the past).  Diane King

 

MISSISSIPPI07 070

HR 6208 – STOPPING CRITICISM OF HOLOCAUST OF EUROPE  (“Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.”)

 

Dear Congressman Gohmert:  I VEHEMENTLY OPPOSE THIS BILL:  I find this horrendous.  First of all, it’s none of our business how they conduct themselves in Europe other than the egregious human rights violations, being jailed for differing opinion.  If we’re not going to help those targeted for persecution and prosecution for these opinions, WE SHOULD STAY OUT OF IT.  Not our drama, not our problem. Secondly,  I vehemently oppose ANYTHING that suppresses and oppresses FREE SPEECH!  We should be championing not punishing investigation of history especially when mountain of evidence of the facts emerge.  I will be calling you about this. This proposed bill is an outrage on so many levels. SO I SUGGEST HANDS OFF. Diane King

**************************

 

Track your bills people because the Judaica are here to file bills that take away your freedom of speech.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hr6208/text

114th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 6208

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 28, 2016

Mrs. Lowey (for herself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Engel, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Israel, Ms. Granger, Mr. Deutch, and Mr. Roskam) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

Please be aware that the Judaica are trying to influence our legislatures to enact this bill and notice part of what it says:

(D)

“Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.”

This free speech opinion negating bill of nonsense will stop ALL criticism of the holocaust. Do you see what is happening here?  You need to follow the Judaics because they do this all the time through the back door while Americans are sleeping. What the hell does Europe have to do with America in the First place? The Judaica did this with our Constitution back in 1787. They used their influence to get rid of Loyalty Oaths and Religious Test.

 

(4)

Since 2010, the Department of State has adhered to the working definition of Anti-Semitism by the European Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC). Some contemporary examples of anti-Semitism include the following:

(A)

Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews (often in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion).

(B)

Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such, or the power of Jews as a collective, especially, but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government, or other societal institutions.

(C)

Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, the State of Israel, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

(D)

Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

(E)

Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interest of their own countries.

________________________________________________________________________

Videographer Joe Rizoli writes:
I have a problem with this stand by these Lawmakers for the various reasons.

1. What is anti-semitism?

A very good question, because from where I stand it seems that antisemitism is not someone hating Jews but who the Jews have decided to hate for the multitude like  reasons that could be anything, including a philosophical disagreement or more recent it seems, a disagreement over a historical happening.

This resolution is no more that a one way street to placate one religious persuasion to stop all criticism, discussion or opinions that are not favorable to the Jews, period.

One wonders how far the ADL, the backers of resolutions such as this, would have gone if they had existed during the writing of the Declaration of Independence.

How so?

The document that gave us the freedom to exist as a free nation today would never have become a reality if the ADL had existed then because that document was full of criticisms, something your resolution is screaming for by the things it has decreed, criticisms and opinions that differ from the exercising reigning power, England. That founders document exposed as it did a proposition to end tyranny through rebellion and even violence and it complained vigorously about the way the King abused his power towards the colonies.

YOUR resolution does the same thing in limiting freedom of speech through stopping opinions, criticism or even God forbid, an intelligent discussion on the holocaust of the Jewish people or even criticism of Israel, because of its genocidal actions towards the Palestinians. That criticism strangely would be labeled “antisemitism”

Basically, what your saying is, if some nation attacked Israel for its genocidal actions and I applauded those actions I would be labeled an enemy of the Massachusetts State house. Totally absurd. Wake up people. Take the ADL blinders off.

The resolution as quoted by Senator Creem in the Haaratz article states the notion that “in Free Societies, education and remembering past tragedies like the holocaust play a critical role in defeating antisemitism”

That may be true, but Free societies don’t stop criticism of the ruling governmental bodies here OR overseas nationalities, in this case Israel, and it doesn’t stop inquiry into past history such as the holocaust or WW2 history.

If I disagree with the Jewish version of the holocaust I have the right as an American, as governed by free speech and the Bill of Rights, to have an opinion that may differ from established history. It allows revision that corrects wrong opinions that are based on falsehoods and rumor, it stands on facts and truth and you or nobody else has a right to label that as “antisemitism”.

If that is so then even this comment below would by your resolution standards would be antisemitism.

“most of the memoirs and reports of Holocaust survivors are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic  effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…”

–Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950,

Vol. 12, p. 65

Your resolution is NOT needed in America because the Jewish community is thriving wonderfully without the scare tactics of the ADL in promoting that the sky is falling.

Please be wary of the ADL since in times past they have been noted to give awards to notorious mafia figures, one, a Moe Dalitz, who was giving the “Torch of Liberty Award”

Not a good decision to promote love for the ADL and a reason not to put any faith in their opinions.

Your resolution condemning antisemitism unfortunately crosses the line of free speech.

Lastly, please consider as politicians and hopefully Statesmen to cherish these words

of a past Justice,  Robert Jackson.

“….that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein”

Your resolution crosses the line because as high officials it is not your job to force citizens to except this resolution on what ultimately “shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion”

Don’t let the ADL start this nation on a downfall to totalism and don’t let the Massachusetts State House take a stand for another nations “nationalism”, Israel.

Please don’t fall for thus ploy. We don’t need this resolution.

Lastly, please print this for your records and at least make some response about my disagreement with your stance on this well meaning but drastically misguided resolution recently brought to my attention. Please don’t give me a courtesy letter because this resolution, and again I repeat what is mentioned by Robert Jackson crosses the line thus saying:

“….that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein”

Thank you

Joseph Rizoli

Massachusetts lawmakers approve resolution condemning anti-SemitismThe impetus for the measure came from the ADL of New England, out of concern about the rising incidents of global anti-Semitism and its impact on Massachusetts.

By JTA | Mar. 10, 2015 | 2:45 PM

Massachusetts lawmakers in a joint legislative session approved a resolution condemning anti-Semitism and calling for expanded anti-bias and Holocaust education.

A similar resolution that decries anti-Semitism and all forms of faith-based violence is under consideration in New Jersey, where a bill is expected to pass that state’s senate March 16, followed by its state assembly, according to the New Jersey State Association of Jewish Federations.

The Massachusetts resolution was approved on Monday. It was sponsored by State Senator Cynthia Stone Creem, and Lori A. Ehrlich, both Jewish members of the state legislature, and is expected to be signed later this week by Speaker of the House Robert DeLeo and Senate President Stan Rosenberg. As a joint resolution, it does not require the signature of Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker.

The impetus for the Massachusetts measure came from the Anti Defamation League of New England, which initiated discussion with the two leading sponsors out of concern about the rising incidents of global anti-Semitic violence and the impact it is having in Massachusetts, according to Robert Trestan, regional director of ADL New England. He believes Massachusetts is the first state legislature to approve such a measure.

“Events in Europe have elevated the anxiety within the Jewish community,” Trestan said, referring to the murders at the kosher supermarket in Paris and the murder of a Jewish guard outside a Copenhagen synagogue. The regional ADL has seen a rise in the number of reported incidents of anti-Semitism beginning with last summer’s conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza and since the murders in Europe, he said.

There’s also a concern about security for Jewish institutions, Trestan said, noting that Jewish groups have been specifically targeted. Increasing education about anti-Semitism and bigotry and hate should be a priority for all schools, he said.

“This statewide resolution shines a light on a disturbing trend while sending a strong, unequivocal message that such behavior will not be tolerated in the Commonwealth,” said Ehrlich who represents a district north of Boston with many Jewish residents and institutions.

“In free societies, education and remembering past tragedies like the Holocaust play a critical role in defeating fanatical anti-Semitism,” said Creem, who represents Newton, a suburb of Boston with a substantial Jewish population.

A bill condemning anti-Semitism that calls on American and European leaders to take specific actions to confront it is currently before the U.S. Senate, sponsored by Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Mark Kirk (R-Il.).

MORE YOU TUBE CENSORSHIP OF BRIAN RUHE

MORE YOU TUBE CENSORSHIP OF BRIAN RUHE

Regarding your account: Brian Ruhe

We have received a legal complaint regarding your video. After review, the following video: Sinead McCarthy on the Jewish Divide and Conquer of White People – 1 of 3has been blocked from view on the following YouTube country site(s):

Austria, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Germany, France, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Israel, Italy, Martinique, New Caledonia, French Polynesia, Poland, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Reunion, French Southern Territories, Wallis and Futuna, Mayotte

YouTube blocks content where necessary to comply with local laws. Please review our help centre article on legal complaints //support.google.com/youtube/answer/3001497?hl=en-GB.

Yours sincerely,
The YouTube Team

©2016 YouTube, LLC 901 Cherry Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066

PRO WHITE POSTERS DENOUNCED AS “HATE”

PRO WHITE POSTERS DENOUNCED AS “HATE”

What a nasty, constipated regime is the land of political correctness. Carefully, examine the poster below. Do you see anything there about Whites being supreme or any attack on other races? No, the poster simply ticks off some of the anti-White notions of political correctness.

 
However, various hysterics, including two politicians are blaming Donald Trump (we`re pretty sure he didn`t post them) and denouncing them as `racists`and “hate.
 
 “’I was absolutely floored,” (resident Kevin¸)Kerr said. He tweeted photo of the poster, saying he was ‘disgusted by racists empowered by (Donald Trump).’

The signs were quickly denounced on social media by many, while others questioned whether the poster was racist, in some cases citing free speech.

Ward 31 councilor Janet Davis was notified of the sign and said city staff would be removing the posters.

‘This hate is unacceptable in our city,’ Davis tweeted. ‘Staff are removing the posters immediately and investigating who is responsible.’

Nate Erskine-Smith, the member of parliament for Beaches-East York, also condemned the sign. ‘We are better than this. Ignorant, unacceptable and #NotMyCanada,’ he tweeted.

Toronto Police spokesperson Victor Kwong said police have received many reports about the signs and have taken them down.

‘This report will be furthered to see whether or not it is a crime or not,’ Kwong said. ‘We’re looking into it.’`` Toronto Star, November 14, 2016)

And what is unacceptable, Sir:standing up for White rights, not wanting to be blamed for the shortcomings of others or not wanting to be swamped by people of radically different culture.

How pathetic! The Toronto Police Service actually has time to go around ripping down political signs and now must decide whether expressing a political opinion is a `hate crime`.

The Trump Revolution can`t come to Canada fast enough!

Donald Trump has focused repeated attention on the lying, hopelessly biased Mainstream Media or Lamestream Media. To whom does the Star reporter go to find out about Alt-Right? A U.S. spokesman like Jamie Kelso of `The Trump Phenomenon (a daily radio show on RBN, 9:00 p.m. nightly) or Jared Taylor of even me. No, the reporter goes to a mortal enemy of White Identity and free speech, the Jewish  lobby group, ADL.! “’Marilyn Mayo, a research fellow at the Anti-Defamation League’s Center on Extremism, described the alt-right movement as “a loose network of people who promote white identity, and reject mainstream conservatism in favour of a politics that embraces either implicit or explicit racism or white supremacy.” She is not surprised it has appeared in Canada.

Toronto city staff are investigating after signs targeting white people 'sick of being blamed for all the world's problems' and urging them to 'join the alt-right' were spotted around the city on Monday morning.
Toronto city staff are investigating after signs targeting white people ‘sick of being blamed for all the world’s problems’ and urging them to ‘join the alt-right’ were spotted around the city on Monday morning.  (KEVIN KERR)  

HEAR “EVALION”, SWEETHEART OF THE ALT-RIGHT

TORONTO, NOVEMBER 22, 2016:

evalion1
To Commemorate the 53rd Anniversary of the Assassination of anti-Globalist President John F. Kennedy, and to Celebrate the recent Election of anti-Globalist President Donald J. Trump, The Canadian Association for Free Expression Proudly Presents, and Your Ward News Mischievously Sponsors, the world’s first public rally featuring Evalion as Keynote Speaker:

* She is an international teenage internet sensation, BANNED by Twitter and YouTube after over 2 million video views in 8 months!

* She was such a well-known Nationalist celebrity at the time she was BANNED, that the story was covered by European television programs.

* Her clever, sassy, engaging YouTube videos on immigration, National Socialism, pedophilia, the “gay” agenda, and more, are awakening a new generation… and threatening ZioMarxist entities committed to maintaining their oppression of the general population.

* Most recently, she was the victim of Canada Border Service harassment, with unwarranted confiscation of her laptop and personal journals, followed by an 8 hour detention!

* She is the latest and most high-profile target of B’nai Brith censorship.

Evalion will speak on the topic of “How I Became a YouTube Rebel & How to Disseminate Our Nationalist Message to a New Generation”.

DATE: Tuesday, November 22, 2016. 8:00 p.m.

LOCATION: “Your Ward News” Headquarters

ADDRESS: 163 Main Street, just south of Gerrard. Toronto, ON.

It is a 5 minute walk south of Main Station on the Bloor-Danforth Subway line.

[ $10.00 admission fee at door. ]

evalion2

York University Promises B’nai Brith to Ban YOUR WARD NEWS on Campus

York University Promises B’nai Brith to Ban YOUR WARD NEWS on Campus

YOUR WARD NEWS is a scrappy satirical newspaper with over 300,000 copies per issue which is published in the East End of Toronto. Its stiletto cartoons and articles target the politically correct like the radical environmentalists, Ontario’s free spending lesbian premier Wynne, local leftist politicians, Black Lives Matter, and two of its most determined critics, Liberal Party attack dog Warren Kinsella, and Ottawa lawyer, Richard Warman. The radical left has, over the past several years, done everything to shut them down. Their windows at their Main St. office have been broken repeatedly. There have been numerous complaints to the Toronto Police Service “hate squad” (the thought police) and there  is an ongoing investigation as to whether to charge them for publishing “hate” against privileged minorities. Complaints were made to Canada Post. The local of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers, at one point in 2015t, refused to deliver the papers because the “hate” was too hot for their prissy fingers. Then, Richard Warman, a champion complaint filer, complained  to the Canadian Human Rights Commission against Canada Post which continued to deliver the paper. Last June, Canada’s Newfie Minister of Supply and Procurement Judy Foote, took away editor Dr. James Sears’ mailing rights. That totalitarian move (yes, in Canada, not North Korea) is now being appealed.
The latest assault on the embattled tabloid, Canada’s most spirited satirical publication since the demise of Frank Magazine, came as York University hopped to it when B’nai Brith complained and promised to ban distribution of the tabloid on campus. A November 3 statement from B’nai Brith gloated: “York University has vowed to stop the circulation of Your Ward News – a publication deemed by various human rights groups as anti-semitic, racist and homophobic – after copies of it were widely distributed on York’s Keele campus.   A spokesperson at the York University President’s Office told B’nai Brith Canada that it ‘will take appropriate steps to ensure that this publication is not being distributed or delivered to locations on campus.’ B’nai Brith alerted the York administration after copies of Your Ward News were found on official newsstands scattered throughout the Keele campus, including the Lassonde School of Engineering and the Central Square Complex.”On so many levels, the York Administration’s decision is disappointing and pathetic. Even if YWN were “anti-semitic, racist and homophobic”, so what? These are terms of abuse by those who don’t like to be criticized. These are political points of view. A university should be a forum for discussion and debate about ideas not a politically correct indoctrination factory, as many White students say York has become. The lack of commitment of the university to freedom of the press or the marketplace of ideas is scandalous.
The B’nai Brith statement insists YWN ” ‘has no legitimacy as a news publication, there is no reason for it to be distributed on campuses,’ said Amanda Hohmann, National Director of B’nai Brith’s League for Human Rights. ‘We are glad to see that York University has taken the appropriate step of removing it, and freeing up space to display legitimate publications of value for the student body.’” The arrogant thought police at B’nai Brith insist on determining who is a “legitimate” news publication. And, sadly, York University has bent to this outside pressure group. [However, exactly what “appropriate” (there’s that politically correct catch-all term) measures can be used to stop distribution on campus, no one seems to know.] I was recently interviewed as part of Global News’s smear attack on Evalion  (See  story above.) Interviewer Christina Stevens asked why it should be important to identify who is a Jew. Evalion did a video offering her thoughts on that issue. I said it was important as the Jewish lobby, as opposed to some individual Jews, regularly seeks to restrict the rights of other Canadians to talk. This being a case in point, You don’t hear of Italians or Icelanders lobbying for restrictions on free speech
As if to make my point, the B’nai Brith statement boasts:  “York University, which has a large Jewish student population, has been roiled by allegations of anti-semitism for years. In September, York dismissed lab technician Nikolaos Balaskas after B’nai Brith exposed his anti-semitic posts on social media.” So, after B’nai Brith went whining to the York Administration about the political views of one their employees, the poor wretch was promptly fired. This is not satirical but the chutzpah would be worthy of YWN‘s zany writers, B’nai Brith actually bills itself as practising “grass roots human rights advocacy”. Well, only if “human rights” does not include freedom of speech and freedom of the press. — Paul Fromm

York U Vows to Stop Circulation of Antisemitic Publication

Screen-shot-2016-06-07-at-4.42.00-PM_(1).png
Screenshot of Your Ward News

Whatcott $104 million lawsuit hearing this coming Tuesday!

 

Whatcott $104 million lawsuit hearing this coming Tuesday!

Whatcott $104 million lawsuit hearing this coming Tuesday!

Postby Bill Whatcott » Mon Nov 14, 2016 1:16 am

Image
Crack top secret Christian Commando Bill Whatcott and an unsuspecting leatherman
pose for a photo together at the 2016 Toronto homosexual shame paradeDear Friends,

Please pray for my upcoming hearing at the Ontario Superior Court in Toronto this coming Tuesday, November 15th. Pray that not only is the homofascist attempt to force me to give up my friend’s names so “Big Gay” can go and financially destroy them is stopped, but pray that this entire vexatious lawsuit is thrown out.

In Christ’s Service
Bill Whatcott

“Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me has everlasting life. I am the bread of life”
John 6:47, 48

Bill Whatcott fights $104 million lawsuit over ‘gay zombies’ Pride protest
Steve Weatherbe
LifeSiteNews
Fri Nov 11, 2016 – 4:18 pm EST
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/gay-z … ation-suit

TORONTO, November 11, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Anti-homosexuality campaigner Bill Whatcott is using a hearing called by the homosexual activists suing him for $104 million to get their defamation suit dismissed as a violation of his Charter rights.

According to the argument submitted by Whatcott:

The class action lacks bona fides. It is not brought in good faith. It is a political tool designed to ‘smoke out’ political opponents. It is designed to punish political opponents and to suppress constitutional freedoms. It is designed to intimidate, bully Whatcott, chill free speech, and financially ruin his supporters. Its stated purpose is to crush and “stamp out” anyone opposed to the gay agenda. It is a politically motivated action done in concert with the Liberal federal and provincial governments of Canada and Ontario and supported by the Liberal subclass.

Whatcott and several named and unnamed supporters are being sued in a class action by several Ontario public homosexuals such as one-time Liberal MPP George Smitherman and gay bar owner Christopher Hudspeth for defaming them and all 500,000 participants in Toronto’s Gay Pride Parade. Whatcott led a small group of so-called “gay zombies,” who distributed approximately 3,000 information kits warning against the immorality and health risks of homosexual practices and urging a spiritual and religious conversion to Christianity.

The plaintiffs, who claim to be acting for both Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne as members of a defamed “class” of Liberal politicians, have secured a November 15 hearing to seek a court order forcing Whatcott to identify several supporters who joined him in the parade effectively disguised in green body suits.

Hudspeth has said the lawsuit was intended to “smoke out” all who helped Whatcott in any way — with funds, with preparation of the kits, and by donning the green suits and handing out kits.

But Whatcott’s lawyer, Charles Lugosi, has prepared an exhaustive factum urging protection of the anonymous participants and dismissal of the lawsuit as an attack on Charter freedoms of speech, thought, expression, religion, and association.

The Lugosi/Whatcott argument is basically: What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. The factum cites statements by organizers showing the Gay Pride Parade is, as the factum puts it, a “significant political event” providing a “golden opportunity” for the Ontario homosexual community to push for expanded rights and status. The defendants’ factum argues that it ought to be a golden opportunity for those who oppose this agenda too.

The factum also notes the parade was funded by more than $800,000 in grants from federal, provincial, and municipal governments and $729,000 in services. In addition, it claims that the official participation by Trudeau, Wynne and hundreds of other Liberal politicians was intended to “strengthen their alliance with the gay community.”

Whatcott’s factum argues:

This makes the parade a public and political event where, the defendants claim, they should be entitled under the Charter to express an opposing viewpoint. It is difficult to imagine a guaranteed right more important to a democratic society than freedom of expression. Indeed, a democracy cannot exist without that freedom to express new ideas and to put forward opinions about the functioning of public institutions. The concept of free and uninhibited speech permeates all democratic societies and institutions. The vital importance of the concept cannot be overemphasized. No doubt that was the reason why the framers of the Charter set forth s. 2(b) in absolute terms.” Section 2(b) guarantees freedom of expression.

As for defamation, they rely on the defense of truth for their claims about the health risks and costs of homosexual activities and on their religious and free speech rights for their claims of immorality.

The defendants also argue that the plaintiffs are disqualified because they do not have legally “clean hands.” The parade, the defendants say, “was a display of immoral, indecent public nudity, uninhibited obscene lewd erotic behavior, blasphemous costumes, which were obscene and insulted Christians and other people of faith, and biased free speech extolling the hedonistic gay lifestyle … ”

The defendants also claim that there were men and women paraders “exposing their sexual organs to children” and breaking the Criminal Code in other ways.

Such illegal behavior provoked the protest by the “gay zombies,” the factum asserts, adding, “Equity in these circumstances does not entitle the plaintiffs to equitable remedies.”

The defendants also address the plaintiffs’ demand that Whatcott reveal the names of his supporters, arguing their Charter freedoms would be endangered if their identities were exposed, especially given the plaintiff’s expressed intent to “stamp” them “out. ” The factum recounts the historic importance of anonymous pamphleteers in the cause of civil and religious rights in Great Britain and America, at times when publication of certain arguments could draw the death penalty. The factum states:

Freedom of expression is constitutionally protected even when done anonymously. The disclosure of identity is the choice of the individual who has chosen to remain anonymous. The freedom to remain anonymous is an integral part of the right to freedom of expression.
The factum concludes by charging the plaintiffs with “abuse of process” and calling for the suit’s dismissal with all costs awarded to Whatcott.

User avatar
Bill Whatcott
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 6647
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 11:33 am
Location: Edmonton, AB

B