Dr. Robert MrCorkill, An Honourable Man

Some of the attendees in late November at the National Alliance invitation-only event honoring Dr. Robert McCorkill. His memorial is permanently located on National Alliance property; the new warehouse for the William Pierce Memorial Library and Research Center can be seen up the hill in the background.

American Dissident Voices broadcast of 9 December, 2023

by Kevin Alfred Strom

LET ME TELL you a story about an honorable man. A man whose last wishes were disrespected after his death, when he could do nothing about it. A man whose legacy was reviled and hated by the Jewish power structure — so reviled and so hated that they forced him, quite an eminent man during his lifetime, to lie in an unmarked grave. And it is also a story about this man — Dr. Robert McCorkill — finally getting his due mead of glory, his life-memorial, and a fitting remembrance ceremony at the National Alliance community two weeks ago.

The memorial stone

The memorial stands on a wooded hill in the mountains of Upper East Tennessee, on National Alliance property, just down the hill from the site of the William Pierce Memorial Library and Research Center, and overlooking another grassy knoll on which the future Cosmotheist Chapel will be built. Along with the Life Rune with oak leaves symbol designed by Dr. William Pierce, on its stone face are engraved the words: “Robert McCorkill, 1935-2004, His Loyalty Was His Honor.” Next to his dates of birth and death are the life rune and death rune, symbols long used by many of our European ancestors for that same purpose. (I can even remember finding late-19th-century Norwegian-language newspapers in my grandparents’ attic in northern Minnesota, where birth and death notices were accompanied by these runes.)

Back in 2016, I wrote a summary of Dr. McCorkill’s life and career and his work for the Alliance, and the insanely unjust treatment he received after his death at the hands of organized Jewry. Let me quote some passages from that account, along with my commentary I’ll add today.

* * *

Dr. Robert McCorkill was a soft-spoken retired chemistry professor from St. John, New Brunswick, Canada. He was something of a Renaissance man — becoming a writer in addition to receiving his Ph.D. in chemistry from the University of Manitoba, carrying out geo- and cosmo-chemical research at MIT and the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, and teaching at several universities, including Harvard.

He was also a dedicated, hard-working member of the National Alliance.

[After his retirement, he not only worked as an editor and researcher for the National Alliance, but he uprooted himself from a comfortable situation and relocated to the National Alliance West Virginia campus, where he helped Dr. Pierce in numerous practical ways in addition to his primary duties — and let me add, that to anyone who knew Dr. Pierce, you know for sure that those “practical ways” included a lot of hard work. Dr. McCorkill didn’t have to make that decision. With his achievements and qualifications, he could have had endless lucrative opportunities at research institutes, private industry, NGOs, or government service. But he chose to live in a spartan cabin and work for the continued existence of his race by helping the National Alliance. He was even by our National Alliance founder’s side, every day, during William Pierce’s final battle with cancer in a West Virginia hospital. That is an honorable man.]

[Dr. McCorkill died two years after Dr. Pierce, in 2004. Then began a story so unbelievable that it’s hard to conceptualize without a deep insight into the hate-crazed soul of the racial enemy.]

Robert McCorkill’s will was invalidated by the Canadian government in collusion with well-funded Jewish groups — invalidated because he left his estate — valued at between $250,000 (in 2004 dollars) to $1,000,000 — to the National Alliance.

Both concurrent with and after his work at several Canadian universities and the Canadian Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, Dr. McCorkill was able to pursue his lifelong interest in history and prehistory, and became a collector of antiquities from ancient civilizations. It was his collection of these artifacts, some of which were exceedingly rare coins that was to go to the Alliance, along with the rest of his estate.

I first met Robert McCorkill in the early 2000s. He had joined the National Alliance in 1998. He and I both worked on projects for Dr. Pierce, and sometimes we collaborated. He moved to the Alliance’s West Virginia campus to do that work while Dr. Pierce was still alive, voluntarily accepting a rather spartan existence to do so. He was an intelligent, determined, and generous man. He was selflessly dedicated to the ideals and mission of the National Alliance — the survival and advancement of the European race. Dr. McCorkill willed not only his valuable collection of ancient coins, weapons, and other artifacts, but also some valuable investments, to the National Alliance — his entire estate. Dr. Pierce’s trusted associate, Fred Streed, was named executor of Dr. McCorkill’s will.

The estate went through all the necessary legal procedures, paperwork, et cetera — and was ready for final probate in 2013. Suddenly, Dr. McCorkill’s estranged sister, Isabelle McCorkell — so estranged that she usually didn’t even use the same spelling for her last name — appeared on the scene, objecting to the will. She was also so estranged that she had not spoken to or had any contact with her brother since 1991 — 22 years before her sudden reappearance. If she was aware of her brother’s will and its bequest to the National Alliance before 2013, or had any real objection to it, she gave no indication of it — saying and doing precisely nothing, making no legal claims of any kind, for nine long years since Robert McCorkill’s death. [Evidence also shows that, until she was contacted by Jewish groups, she wasn’t even aware her brother had died nine years earlier!]

At the very last possible moment, when the bequest was soon slated to be disbursed — Isabelle McCorkell materialized, brandishing legal papers calling for the will to be overturned. Strangely, these legal papers had been prepared by one of the priciest law firms in New Brunswick, despite the fact that Miss McCorkell claimed to be in “straitened circumstances.” And, even more strangely, this obscure and previously totally uninvolved woman was accompanied by a veritable army of hand-holders, “advisors,” “spokesmen,” and handlers — people she didn’t know and hadn’t met until almost that very moment — including the Attorney General of New Brunswick, and several Jewish groups including the “League of Human Rights” of B’nai B’rith, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, and, leading the charge even though it is not a Canadian organization, Alabama’s so-called Southern Poverty Law Center.

Now, what do you think the chances are that poor little Isabelle arranged this coalition of force and money on her own? (The SPLC alone has a war chest of hundreds of millions.) Or is it more likely that Isabelle was a paid-off pawn in a dirty game of politics and payoffs designed to prevent the National Alliance from receiving what it is due and what Dr. McCorkill wanted it to have?

Neither the SPLC’s high-priced lawyers nor the Jewish fixers made any claim that Dr. McCorkill’s will was not properly drawn. They did not allege that Dr. McCorkill was not of sound mind when he made his will. They made not the slightest suggestion that there was any irregularity of any kind in the will itself or in the probate procedures. They even made no claim that Isabelle had any familial right to even one cent’s worth of the estate.

Instead, they did what has never been done before: These Jews, using long-estranged Isabelle as a patsy, nakedly and shamelessly demanded that Robert McCorkill’s dying wish — that his wealth be used as he chose and as he believed after his death — be disregarded and ignored because of the political and philosophical views of the National Alliance. They demanded that Dr. McCorkill’s sacred right to dispose of his property as he sees fit, enjoyed (up until today) by every free man under the Anglo-Saxon common law for centuries — be disregarded and ignored because of the political and philosophical views of the National Alliance. They demanded that all the products of Dr. McCorkill’s lifetime of work and thought and experience be brazenly stolen and awarded to a sister that he actively disliked and to other family members which he had purposely omitted from his will — and, further, they demanded that thousands of dollars from the estate also go to pay the alleged “legal expenses” of the Jewish groups who staged these fraudulent proceedings in the first place — groups whose purposes were abhorred by Dr. McCorkill, groups complicit in the ongoing genocide of our race.

And the courts of New Brunswick, including the appeals court and the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa, agreed with these outrageously immoral and blatantly illegal Jewish demands. The estate of Dr. McCorkill was stolen.

Defending against this anti-freedom, illegitimate coalition were the executor of the McCorkill estate, Fred Streed, and the Canadian Association for Free Expression led by stalwart patriot Paul Fromm, and lawyers for the National Alliance.

The man who made the initial decision to accede to these Jewish demands is Judge William Grant of the New Brunswick Court of Queen’s Bench. Judge Grant ruled that the will could be voided because, he said, the National Alliance’s published positions — that Whites, like any other race on planet Earth, require exclusive living space in order to survive and are morally justified in achieving that prerequisite for life — were “disgusting, repugnant and revolting.” Judge Grant ruled that Whites seeking to change society so as to achieve White living space would be by definition violating Canadian “hate speech” laws and acting contrary to Canadian “public policy.” The judge stated that, just by existing and advocating for White survival and identifying those who are committing genocide against Whites, the National Alliance was in violation of the Canadian Criminal Code, section 319(2), prohibiting the public promotion of “hatred against any identifiable group.”…

Judge Grant is a despicable liar. Even if you accept these pretended laws limiting White Canadians’ freedom of speech as valid — which I do not and nor should any moral, upstanding man — there still is zero evidence justifying his decision. National Alliance literature is freely distributed in Canada and there have been no prosecutions on such a basis. This National Alliance radio program has been heard in Canada (initially via shortwave station WRNO and clear channel AM station KXEL, and now via the Internet and the National Alliance Radio Network) since 1991 and is still heard there today. Neither the National Alliance, nor its American members or Canadian members, are banned in Canada. Neither the National Alliance nor its members have been convicted or even charged with violating any such laws in Canada. As Paul Fromm put it: “Has a New Brunswick court taken us into Alice in Wonderland and the Court of the Red Queen? — The verdict is ‘guilty’; no need for a trial; now on to the sentence!”

Plenty of Canadians of many different political persuasions were outraged by this decision, as they should be. A few comments which have gotten through the censorship are these: “This decision means your legal will now means nothing. You simply cannot leave your estate to people ‘the public’ decides it doesn’t like. I think for this reason the decision is outrageous, and will come back to haunt people.” … “The [Jewish] ancestry of many of the big-name law firms was a factor in this decision, to be sure”… “So, if the guy sold his collection before he died and gave the money to the group it would have been allowed, but after he dies his wishes don’t matter.” … “Watch out — soon we won’t be able to make donations or give gifts without government approval” … “You can’t receive bequests if you have acted illegally? What about when you chase school children to UN shelters and murder them [as Israel has done]? Attack a rescue ship in international waters, kill a dozen and wound dozens of rescuers? There is only one race that can do that in front of the whole world and get away with it and I don’t have to tell you who.” … “The National Alliance has never been convicted of a single crime in Canada, yet cannot be a beneficiary in your will. Yet our major political parties and their leaders are regularly convicted of crimes, including serious felonies, and they can and do receive bequests and not a word is said about it. I guess whether or not you have rights in Canada all depends on what B’nai B’rith thinks about you.”

* * *

Perhaps even more outrageous than the theft of Dr. McCorkill’s fortune is the fact that, after all the screaming in the controlled media about the estate and the National Alliance — and Dr. McCorkill’s devotion to it — Jews got together and successfully prevented any marker whatsoever from appearing over his grave — because, supposedly, “some Jews are buried in same cemetery,” and they would feel fearful or afraid or offended by a stone even bearing the name of this ferocious “hater.”

Now I’ve seen it all. Dead Jews in fear of (or in fear of being offended by) a dead National Alliance member — but their fear can be allayed just by denying him a grave marker. So, for many years, Dr. Robert McCorkill, that honorable man, that very honorable man, was denied a memorial.

Now he has his memorial. Now he has had his service of remembrance. Now his community — the National Alliance intentional White community — will remember him always. And I am proud to have been a part of that.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. We welcome your inquiries and your financial support in spreading our message of hope to our people. We also welcome your applications for membership in our community of the conscious. Once again, that address is Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. Thank you for your help.

Even Politicians Are Not Free to Speak Their Minds

Even Politicians Are Not Free to Speak Their Minds

Even Politicians Are Not Free to Speak Their Minds

Canada is a nation choking on political correctness. Even politicians, elected or otherwise, are told what they can say and not say. Canada suffers from a lack of frank discussion, especially on issues displeasing to privileged minorities. This leads to a justified cynicism about our governing institutions

Senator censured for ’insensitive’ comments during pro-Freedom Convoy rant

‘This is the capital of the country. It’s not your goddamned city just because you have a six-figure salary and you work 20 hours a week’ Sen. MacDonald said during his rant

Author of the article:The Canadian PressThe Canadian PressDylan RobertsonPublished Dec 05, 2023  •  3 minute read 141 Comments

Conservative Sen. Michael MacDonald.
“This is definitely not an ethical issue,” Conservative Senator Michael MacDonald is quoted as having written about his video rant. Photo by Christopher Katsarov/The Canadian Press/File

OTTAWA — Senators have voted to condemn one of their own, following a colourful rant covertly recorded during the Freedom Convoy protest last year

The Senate ethics watchdog found this spring that Conservative Sen. Michael MacDonald violated the code of conduct.Article content

The Nova Scotia senator was caught on video in February 2022 castigating downtown Ottawa residents who complained about the protests, saying locals were overpaid and underworked.

MacDonald apologized for his remarks in the Senate, and he told media he had been drinking on the evening in question.

The Senate’s ethics officer ruled he had breached six sections of the code that governs senators, including two related to his conduct and four others for a lack of compliance in the investigation itself.

The ethics officer determined that the Red Chamber must formally censure members whose conduct undermines the Senate’s reputation, and senators recently voted to do so.

On Nov. 30, the chamber voted on division to issue the sanction against MacDonald, which does not come with any penalties but holds symbolic value.Related Stories

  1. l

Sen. Dennis Patterson spoke out against the censure, saying the scope of the ethics code seems to go beyond other parliamentary rules that only focus on senators’ conduct while they are carrying out their Senate-related duties.

“Not agreeing to the remediation recommendations of the (ethics officer) is quite different than not co-operating,” Patterson added, in remarks right before the vote last week.Article content

He said at the time that he was “appalled that we appear to be associated with extremists,” whom he argued undertook a “hostage occupation of the heart of our Canadian democracy.”

MacDonald apologized again last week for his “insensitive” remarks, and added that he regretted his conduct during the investigation. He said a parliamentary committee had treated him fairly.

“I was eager to move on, yet felt embarrassed, isolated and frustrated by the process. But I could have handled it better; that is entirely on me,” he told the chamber.

The watchdog’s investigation had been prompted by complaints from nine of MacDonald’s peers.

Shortly after the video footage emerged, MacDonald apologized in the chamber, and stressed that the conversation wasn’t meant to be recorded.

In the recording, MacDonald is heard saying he doesn’t want to be recorded. The videographer responds by saying “OK.”Article content

MacDonald then goes on to some frank remarks.

“It’s everybody’s f–king city, this is the capital of the country. It’s not your goddamned city just because you have a six-figure salary and you work 20 hours a week. You haven’t worked a full week in two years. It’s sickening,” MacDonald says in the recording.

In the video, MacDonald refers to his wife as “a Karen” — a derogatory term for a self-entitled woman — for opposing the protests. Despite police ordering protesters to clear the scene, MacDonald says that “I don’t want them to leave.”

Senate ethics officer Pierre Legault said the senator’s request to not be filmed showed “an intentional failure to exercise dignified reserve and restraint,” and that his comments left a “significant impact” on the institution.

The watchdog added that the senator’s initial apology was undermined by his comment that his comments weren’t meant to be captured on video.

“Senators are expected to represent Canadians, not denigrate, mock and demean them, while encouraging illegal activities at a time when a state of emergency had been declared,” Legault said in a July report.Article content

The ethics officer and MacDonald argued over the mandate of his office, such as pushing back on a request to know whom MacDonald was dining with before the video, to tell whether he had been conducting Senate business.

The Senate ethics committee, staffed by MacDonald’s peers, issues a report in September finding that he had not appropriately complied with the investigation.

“It was a direct challenge to the integrity and mandate of the Senate-approved process by which senators — and the Senate itself _ are to be held accountable,” the report reads.

Penticton 4 Freedom Christmas Gathering

image.png

PLEASE RSVP (reply to this email)by WEDNESDAY, December 6th if you are attending~ Thank you!!!

Penticton 4 Freedom Christmas Gathering

When: Saturday, December 9, 2023 – 1 to 6 p.m.

Where: 272 Green Avenue, Penticton

Details:

·        Bob and Geraldine are hosting a private “Friends Christmas Party” in the party room of their building and inviting us to join them.

·        This is a potluck event. Food will be available starting at 1:30. Please arrive early if you need to heat your potluck dish.

·        Facilities include microwave (but no stove), coffee maker, kettle. Tea and coffee will be provided. BYORefreshments for greater variety.

·        Disposable dishes and cutlery will be provided from our P4F supplies.

·        Large room with both ping pong and pool table, washroom, tables and chairs aplenty.

·        Agenda items:

·        Music – (bring your Bluetooth Christmas music) and Sing-along time.

·        Meet and Greet with a “get to know you” game

·        White Elephant Gift Exchange for fun: Bring something you already own (particularly fun if you can recycle something you received as a gift in the past and always wanted to get rid of – new or used, clean), or if you wish, pick up a fun or fantastic gift – suggested budget not more than $10. Thrift stores and dollar stores are great resources. Wrap however you wish, enough to conceal your gift until it’s opened.

·        Stories of Christmases past – the craziest, funniest, best, worst… Bring Your Own Story

·        A review of the past year at P4F and a look to 2024. (Max 15 minutes)

·        As much fun as you can cram into your time with us.

Parking: In front of the building, with overflow at the back in visitor parking spots.

Building entry: Front of building. Someone may be at the front door to let you in, or just tap on the big party room window to get attention, if needed. Or…

Call Bob’s cell for entry: 250-462-8053

Mary Lou Gutscher

780-908-0309

Penticton4Freedom@gmail.com 

How The Media Misled Us About Residential School — Buy Some for Christmas Gifts

After the announcement by the T’kemlups First Nation of the discovery of so-called unmarked graves at the site of the former Kamloops residential school, many politicians, Indigenous leaders, and media have thrown aside balance, restraint, and caution, turning truth into a casualty.

Public discussion about residential schools is now either totally false or grossly exaggerated. 

Canada is accused of the most heinous crimes, with some even accusing our country of committing genocide.
A more balanced picture of residential schools is the only road to genuine Reconciliation.

True North is proud to partner with Dorchester Books to publish Grave Error: How the Media Misled Us (and The Truth about Residential Schools) by Dr. Tom Flanagan and Dr. C.P. Champion.

This excellent collection of first rate articles challenges the false narrative surrounding Canada’s residential schools and treatment of Indigenous Canadians.

Grave Error is available now just in time for Christmas! Get your copy today! 

Police officer challenges harsh discipline in free speech case

Police officer challenges harsh discipline in free speech case
The Ontario Civilian Police Commission recently heard the appeal of Constable Michael Brisco on November 21, 2023, who is challenging his conviction and penalty for donating to the Ottawa Freedom Convoy in early 2022. This case raises questions about the Charter’s protection for freedom of expression, the right of police officers to support political causes while off duty, and the privacy rights of all Canadians. Constable Michael Brisco of the Windsor Police Service is a highly trained and respected police officer with no prior disciplinary record. He made a $50 donation to the peaceful Freedom Convoy protest through the GiveSendGo fundraising platform on February 8, 2022 – one day after an Ontario Superior Court Judge held that people could continue to engage in “peaceful, lawful and safe protest” in Ottawa so long as honking ceased. When making his donation, Constable Brisco did not identify himself as a police officer and did not contribute to the protest in his capacity as a police officer. After a six-day hearing in February 2023 before an Ontario Provincial Police Adjudicator, Constable Brisco was found guilty of discreditable conduct. Two months later, on May 18, 2023, the Tribunal ordered that Constable Brisco should forfeit pay for 80 hours of work as a penalty. With the support of the Justice Centre, on June 14, 2023, Constable Brisco filed a Notice of Appeal with Ontario Civilian Police Commission, challenging his conviction and the imposed penalty.

Censorship Industrial Complex, Part 2: Michael Shellenberger Testifies Before Congress

Censorship Industrial Complex, Part 2: Michael Shellenberger Testifies Before Congress

The Censorship-Industrial Complex, Part 2

 

U.S. and foreign government support for domestic censorship and disinformation, 2016 – 2022

 

Testimony by Michael Shellenberger to The House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government

 

November 30, 2023

 

 

Chairman Jordan, Ranking Member Plaskett, and members of the Subcommittee thank you for inviting my testimony.

Nine months ago, I testified and provided evidence to this subcommittee about the existence of a Censorship Industrial Complex, a network of government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, government contractors, and Big Tech media platforms that conspired to censor ordinary Americans and elected officials alike for holding disfavored views.

I regret to inform the Subcommittee that the scope, power, and law-breaking of the Censorship Industrial Complex are even worse than we had realized back in March.

Two days ago, my colleagues and I published the first batch of internal files from “The Cyber Threat Intelligence League,” which show US and UK military contractors working in 2019 and 2020 to both censor and turn sophisticated psychological operations and disinformation tactics, developed abroad, against the American people.

Many insist that all we identified in the Twitter Files, the Facebook Files, and the CTIL Files were legal activities by social media platforms to take down content that violated their terms of service. Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and other Big Tech companies are privately owned and free to censor content. And government officials are free to point out wrong information, they argue.

But the First Amendment prohibits the government from abridging freedom of speech, the Supreme Court has ruled that the government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish,” and there is now a large body of evidence proving that the government did precisely that.

What’s more, the whistleblower who delivered the CTIL Files to us says that its leader, a “former” British intelligence analyst, was “in the room” at the Obama White House in 2017 when she received the instructions to create a counter-disinformation project to stop a “repeat of 2016.”

The US Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Information Security Agency (CISA) has been the center of gravity for much of the censorship, with the National Science Foundation financing the development of censorship and disinformation tools and other federal government agencies playing a supportive role.

Emails from CISA’s NGO and social media partners show that CISA created the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) in 2020, which involved the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO) and other US government contractors. EIP and its successor, the Virality Project (VP), urged Twitter, Facebook, and other platforms to censor social media posts by ordinary citizens and elected officials alike.

In 2020, the Department of Homeland Security’s CISA violated the First Amendment and interfered in the election, while in 2021, CISA and the White House violated the First Amendment and undermined America’s response to the Covid pandemic by demanding that Facebook and Twitter censor content that Facebook said was “often-true,” including about vaccine side effects.

But the abuses of power my colleagues and I have documented go well beyond censorship. They also include what appears to be an effort by government officials and contractors, including the FBI, to frame certain individuals as posing a threat of domestic terrorism for their political beliefs. 

All of this is profoundly unAmerica. One’s commitment to free speech means nothing if it does not extend to your political enemies.

In his essential new book, Liar in a Crowded Theater: Freedom of Speech in a World of Misinformation, Jeff Kosseff, a law professor at the United States Naval Academy shows that the widespread view that the government can censor false speech and/or speech that “causes harm” is mostly wrong. The Supreme Court has allowed very few constraints on speech. For example, the test of incitement to violence remains its immediacy.

In the face of human fallibility, and the complexity of reality, America’s founders and others worldwide long ago decided that it was best to let people speak their minds almost all the time, particularly about controversial social and political issues.

I encourage Congress to defund and dismantle the governmental organizations involved in censorship. That includes phasing out funding for the  National Science Foundation’s Track F, “Trust & Authenticity in Communication Systems,” and its “Secure and Trustworthy Cyberspace (SaTC)” track. I would also encourage Congress to abolish CISA in DHS. Short of taking those steps, I would encourage significant guard rails and oversight to prevent such censorship from happening again.

Finally, I would encourage Congress to consider making Section 230 liability protections contingent upon social media platforms, known in the law as “interactive computer services,” to allow adult users to moderate their own legal content, through filters they choose, and whose algorithms are transparent to users.

I would also encourage Congress to prohibit government officials from asking the platforms from removing content, which the Supreme Court may or may not rule unconstitutional next year when it decides on the Missouri v. Biden case. Should the Court somehow decide that government requests for censorship are constitutional, then I urge Congress to require such requests be reported publicly and instantaneously so that such censorship demands occur in plain sight.

Having summarized the problem and potential solutions, I would like to now dedicate the rest of my testimony to the new information revealed in the CTIL Files.