Victorian protective service officers walk past a sign urging people to stay home during Melbourne’s lockdown. Victoria is forcing every person seeking to enter the Australian state to obtain a new permit, including people who live there. Those who flout the new Covid-19 rules risk being slapped with an AU$5,000 ($3,856) fine.
Premier Daniel Andrews announced the new regulation while detailing a relaxation of his state’s hard border with New South Wales.
The changes mean that Victoria residents stuck in regional parts of the neighboring state – which have been designated as an ‘orange zone’ – can prepare to return to their homes. However, the city of Sydney remains designated as a ‘red zone’ and is not included in the relaxed measures.
The new rules apply to every arrival in the state, even those from Covid-safe states and territories that have not experienced virus outbreaks in months.
As well as obtaining the permit, travellers from an ‘orange zone’ are required to get tested within 72 hours of arriving and must quarantine until they receive a negative test result.
Andrews has faced criticism from civil liberties campaigners and political opponents for his tough measures throughout the Covid-19 pandemic.
The latest move was blasted by opposition Leader Michael O’Brien, who accused the government of overreach for policing people who travel through green zones.
“Doesn’t matter if you’ve been to a green zone that’s never had a case of coronavirus in its history, you now need the Government’s permission before you can come back to Victoria,” O’Brien said.
This is a huge step, it puts the Government in control of every single Victorian’s life.
Reports in Australian news outlets suggest the traffic light system could remain in place for much of 2021.
The pandemic is revealing more uncomfortable truths
by the day, like our willingness to abandon our freedoms and traditions
at the first whiff of grapeshot.
Governments mistrustful of citizens have been too quick to respond to
risks to public health with coercion, rather than simply appealing for a
civic-minded people to do the right thing.
In Australia
there has been a level of official control seldom seen since the
convict era. There has been barely any opposition. A people once
prepared to make the ultimate sacrifice of lives in defence of liberty
is surrendering its freedom on the pretext of saving lives.
It is teaching us that when we dispense with the checks and balances
that make democratic governments better than they otherwise might be,
there is an exponential increase in the number and scale of
state-induced blunders.
When Britain, the US and much of Europe were struggling with mass
outbreaks in April, Australia and New Zealand had the virus under
control thanks largely to the prompt closure of borders.
It might have stayed that way but for a breach of quarantine security
in Melbourne, where inadequate supervision of returning Australians in
hotel quarantine allowed infected people to escape.
The loss of life has so far been slight: around 40 deaths per million
in Victoria and fewer than 15 in the rest of Australia, compared with
around 700 in Britain and around 500 in the US.
Yet the elevated risk was enough for Victoria’s premier, Dan Andrews, to declare a State of Disaster for only the second time in Victoria’s history. Andrews, incidentally, was responsible for declaring both of them. R
Victoria became an autocracy overnight, granting unfettered power to a
premier unaccountable to parliament and freed from the rule of law. The
police have turned from citizens in uniform to the enforcers of
ministerial declarations, most of them quite absurd.
Melbourne has become the first city in Australia to fall under a
curfew. Andrews’ predecessors felt no need for one during the First
World War, Second World War, the Spanish Flu pandemic or the 1923 police
strike when violent mobs rampaged through the city and overturned a
tram.
Yet the outbreak virus from China which currently kills a small
proportion of those it affects in the general population, and a
negligible percentage of people below retirement age, was considered
grave enough to suspend democracy and the rule of law.
The bridge over the River Murray on the Hume Highway linking the
Victorian city of Wodonga and Albury in New South Wales has become
Australia’s Checkpoint Charlie, the free world on one side and tyranny
on the other.
Those tempted to swim across should know that police and army
reservists are patrolling the Murray’s northern banks assisted by
helicopters and drones. Up to six months in jail awaits those without
papers.
Melbourne residents who leave their homes between 8pm and 5am face a
$5,000 fine, imposed by police not the courts. Fines will also be issued
to anyone who, a) is caught without a mask; b) exercises for more than
an hour; c) wanders further than 5km from home; d) is judged by police
to be shopping excessively in the small number of shops allowed to stay
open; e) gets married; f) overnights in the house of someone other than
their designated intimate partner; g) goes fishing; or h) plays golf.
Like the villain in a dystopian novel, Victoria’s democratically
elected premier is interfering with citizen’s private lives in a manner
most will have imagined impossible in a nation settled by the heirs of
Magna Carta.
In his masterful book on the Anglosphere, Dan Hannan praised
Australia as a country where the libertarian philosophy of John Stuart
Mill was made flesh. Hannan might care to revisit that bit, as Victoria
breaks record after record in the contest of illiberalism, employing all
the available instruments of modern surveillance to keep its citizens
in check.
If the premier and his officials know how many cases of infection can
be tolerated they are keeping it from the citizens. No one knows how
long the lockdown measures will end or what comes next.
The consequences for the Victorian economy, which accounts for a
quarter of Australia’s GDP, are growing exponentially. The price of
shutting down business today is the loss of future opportunity. The
effects of this recession will be felt for a generation at least. The
most deadly effects of the virus may be reserved for the elderly and
sickly, but the biggest losers will be those in the prime of their life.
Much of what we are losing cannot be counted in dollars and cents. Freedoms, once surrendered, can be impossible to recover.
We dishonour the victims of early tyrannies to make comparisons, tempting as it might be.
The assumption of emergency powers to fight a real or exaggerated
threat is the oldest trick in the manual of despotism. Countries ruled
by tyranny are frequently those from which millions long to flee, just
as they do in Victoria right now, if only for a holiday.
The erosion of democracies typically begins with the indefinite
suspension of parliament, as the Victorian state parliament has been.
Autocrats are drawn to centrally planned economies, with the
inevitable mismatch of supply and demand. Residents of Victoria, the
food bowl of Australia, face shortages of meat and other essentials and
the prospect of rationing for the first time since the Second World War.
Autocracies are notorious for the proliferation of permits and the
checking of papers. In Victoria a permit is required to travel, to work
or cross the border. Military are being used as auxiliary police, police
powers have been drastically increased and punitive fines introduced.
Citizens are encouraged to act as informants against their employer and also neighbours.
There has not been one guarantee that all or any of these crackdown laws will be repealed.
Those who grew up with pride in their country and its part in
overcoming the great 20th-century tyrannies are understandably shocked
at how much we appear willing to surrender for benefits that are as yet
unspecified.
We shouldn’t be surprised at the tacit compliance of the media,
which, by and large, has not seen fit to challenge the measures.
Journalists, like some politicians, have a professional interest in
exaggerating the threat. ‘All quiet on the Covid-19 front’ is not a
story worthy of page one.
With time, the Andrews administration’s draconian and illiberal
stage-four lockdown will come to be seen as a monstrous administrative
mistake that has compounded the effects of the blunders that allowed the
virus to run wild.
Let’s hope at least that the lockdown slows the general rate of
infection, since the government seems incapable of protecting
nursing-home residents any other way.
Even if it does, we are bound to ask if the result was worth the
months that will have been added to the recession, the swelling of the
ranks of the long-term unemployed and the shrinkage of the small
business sector, the engine of the economy. And the freedoms citizens
have been forced to relinquish, with no guarantee they will get them
back.
Nick Cater is executive director of the Menzies Research Centre and a columnist with the Australian.