CAFE

Dedicated to Free Speech, Immigration Reform, and Restoring Political Sanity

CAFE

Small Victory for Journalist in Thought Control U.K.

Note: But the fear lingers on. That is how police states operate RH 

  Police drop investigation into Allison Pearson over tweet

Force ditches inquiry after facing criticism for ‘appalling’ attack on free speech

Allison Pearson will face no further action from police
Allison Pearson will face no further action from police
Connor Stringer Senior reporter. Charles Hymas Home Affairs Editor
21 November 2024 8:41pm GMT

Essex Police has dropped its investigation into Allison Pearson, the Telegraph journalist, for an alleged hate crime.

Pearson, an award-winning writer, was being investigated for allegedly stirring up racial hatred with a social media post made in November last year.

Two police officers called at her home at 9.40am on Remembrance Sunday to tell her she was under investigation and invited her to a voluntary interview.

The officers refused to tell her any details about which post on X, formerly Twitter, was being investigated, or who made the complaint against her.

After a major backlash, including from Boris Johnson who called the inquiry an “appalling” attack on free speech, Essex Police announced on Thursday that it had closed its investigation.

Chief Constable Mark Hobrough, the National Police Chiefs’ Council hate crimes lead, will now conduct an independent review of the force’s handling of the case.

Reacting to the decision, Ms Pearson said that she was “vindicated”.

Allison Pearson speaks at an event on Thursday, an hour after receiving the news that her case would be dropped
Allison Pearson speaks at an event on Thursday, an hour after receiving the news that her case would be dropped Credit: ELLIOTT FRANKS

She said: “I am relieved but also it has been a dreadful experience, waking up, and going to sleep with dread. Waking up in the small hours thinking I am under police investigation, that’s not nice for anyone let alone a law-abiding citizen.

“I feel angry with Essex Police, I do not believe there was ever any case to answer, I was expressing my opinion in what I thought was a free society.”

She added: “It is a win for The Telegraph. I hope it is a win for common sense. I am vindicated personally but I have become far more concerned about how widespread this is and how it is casting a chilling effect on free speech.

“I would like to sincerely thank all the Telegraph readers, their support has meant the absolute world.”

The Crown Prosecution Service advised that no charges should be brought against Ms Pearson after reviewing the case. Essex Police said it would therefore take no further action and dropped the investigation.

Pearson initially believed that the matter was being treated as a non-crime hate incident (NCHI) rather than a criminal investigation.

The force responded that this was “wholly inaccurate” and said that “as the public would expect” it had body-worn video of the encounter, which it claimed “entirely supports our position”.

However, it prompted criticism of the incidents, which do not meet the criminal threshold but are recorded by police regardless.

Ms Pearson’s treatment was attacked by MPs, a leading barrister and Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, amid claims it was an “Orwellian” over-reaction and a potential threat to free speech.

Graham Stringer, the Labour MP, who accused the police of Stasi-like behaviour over Pearson in the Commons, said: “I am pleased to see that the exposure to discussion in the Commons seems to have helped persuade the police to withdraw their action.”

Writing in The Telegraph he added: “The police have enthusiastically embraced the recording of non-crime hate incidents. Non-crime incidents have never been required by parliament in legislation and it is certainly not a crime to make somebody feel uncomfortable. In this category, the police have interviewed people for tweeting feminist songs and not allowing a guide dog into a shop. If only Orwell was alive today.”

Suella Braverman, the former home secretary, said the decision was an “embarrassment” for the police and demonstrated why the recording of non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs) needed to be scrapped.

“What a waste of vital police time and resources. This is an embarrassment for the police and the government and questions need to be asked about how this matter got so out of hand in the first place,” she told The Telegraph.

Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: “It should never have come to this. The police should not be policing thought or speech. Police time should only be spent on criminality or behaviour likely to lead imminently to criminality.

“I urge the Government to urgently change the guidelines on NCHIs to stop it happening again.”

An Essex Police spokesman said: “We investigate crimes reported to us without fear or favour.

“We’re sometimes faced with allegations of crime where people have strong opposing views. That’s why we work so hard to remain impartial and to investigate allegations, regardless of where they might lead.”

Sir Iain Duncan Smith, former Tory leader, said: “Hallelujah!! Common sense at last.

“However I still think that serious questions need to be asked about the leadership of the police which seems to have been sold out to the malicious protesters who represent a tiny proportion of the electorate.

“Get back on the streets where shoplifting is rife and gang violence ever present.”

The scale of the investigation was revealed by The Telegraph, with officers from the Metropolitan Police, Sussex Police and Essex Police all handling the complaint over the past year.

The Telegraph understands that the post was reported to the Metropolitan Police as a potential breach of the Malicious Communications Act in November last year. The case was then passed to Sussex Police, which marked it as a possible non-crime hate incident.

Sussex Police passed it to Essex, where Pearson lives. It is understood Essex made two assessments of the complaint before opening an investigation under section 17 of the Public Order Act 1986, relating to material allegedly “likely or intended to cause racial hatred”.

Toby Young, director of the Free Speech Union that provided legal support for Pearson, said Essex Police should now return to “policing our streets, not our tweets”.

He said: “Essex Police should never have investigated this tweet in the first place. It didn’t come close to being a criminal offence, which they’ve now effectively acknowledged.

“I hope the public outcry over this huge waste of time and resources means Essex Police will go back to policing our streets, not our tweets. It’s not their job to investigate newspaper columnists for wrongthink.”

ALLISON PEARSON

My week from hell is proof the Britain we love is gone
Roger Hirst, police, fire and crime commissioner for Essex, said he would “closely scrutinise Essex Police’s approach to this case on behalf of the public”.

He added: “Having discussed this with the Chief Constable I have agreed that he should commission NPCC national hate crime lead, Chief Constable Mark Hobrough, to undertake an independent review. This will support my scrutiny of the force’s approach.

“It is important the public have confidence in their police service. This investigation has caused significant distress for Ms Pearson and a large amount of public concern. It has raised a number of important questions that need to be addressed so all of us can be confident the police are acting properly.

“My role as the police, fire and crime commissioner for Essex is to ensure the police exercise their powers effectively, without fear or favour, and that is what I will continue to do.”

    

Salon owner facing £27,000 fine after quoting Magna Carta to defy lockdown

Salon owner facing £27,000 fine after quoting Magna Carta to defy lockdown

A salon owner who refused to close during England’s current lockdown has been given a £27,000 fine. Sinead Quinn, who runs Quin Blakey Hairdressers, was initially fined £1,000 for staying open after November 5.

She stayed open and further fines were issued. She tried to use the Magna Carta as a defence of her decision to stay open. However, the law she cited – Clause 61, offering 25 barons the right to lawfully dissent or rebel if they thought they were being governed unjustly – was repealed and never incorporated into English law.

Kirklees Council ordered her to pay £4,000 on Saturday and police issued another two £10,000 fines when she opened again on Monday and Tuesday.

Quinn had previously shared videos of herself arguing with council officials and police on Instagram. In one clip she could be seen telling them she didn’t consent to the ‘unlawful’ fines, and cited ‘common law’ in her defence. On Tuesday Quinn shared a picture of a police car outside the salon and captioned it: ‘This is what your tax paying money goes toward. Sitting outside my business whilst I’m lawfully earning a living.’ In another video she accused the police of ‘stalking’ her.

Hairdresser Sinead Quinn She previously put the Magna Carta up in the salon’s door (Picture: Instagram) Police fine the salon Officers have visited the salon twice this week (Picture: Bradford T&A / SWNS)

Kirklees is currently among the most infected areas in England, with a rate of 446.4 cases per 100,000 people in the seven days to November 19. The council said in a statement: ‘It is absolutely crucial for people’s safety that we all follow the latest Covid-19 rules and guidance. ‘Kirklees currently has the fifth highest rates in the country, with 135 people admitted to hospital last week and 25 sadly losing their lives to a Covid-19 related death.

The salon sign The Magna Carta can not be used as a defence in court (Picture: Bradford T&A / SWNS) Quinn Blakey Hairdressing, on Bradford Road, Oakenshaw is visited by two PCSOs as they appeared to be staying open in defiance of lockdown restrictiond, November 10 2020. See SWNS story SWLEhair.

A hair salon appears to have rebelled against the current lockdown rules by staying open despite the tightened coronavirus restrictions. Quinn Blakey Hairdressing, on Bradford Road, Oakenshaw, was seemingly open for business yesterday and at one point, police community support officers arrived at the premises.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson ordered certain businesses – including hairdressers – to close from November 5 in the face of rising Covid-19 cases. On the same day, a post on the salon?s Facebook page said: ?I earned this week?s rent today, not sure where I would be pulling that money from given the government want self employed business people to wait SIX WEEKS for a payment. She has received £27,000 in fines (Picture: Bradford T&A / SWNS)

‘The law set by the Government is there so we can bring infection rates down, ease pressure on our health services and save lives. ‘But it only works if we all stick to it and realise that no one is above the law. Frankly, the actions taken by this business are selfish and irresponsible. ‘We will not hesitate to take action on anyone who breaches the rules that are in place to keep us all safe. Repeated breaches of Covid-19 regulations result in ever increasing fines up to £10,000 and eventually prosecution.’

Read more:

Salon owner facing £27,000 fine after quoting Magna Carta to defy lockdown

Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/

Covid 1984 and The Emperor’s New Clothes

Covid 1984 and The Emperor’s New Clothes

Parallels With Children’s Tale That Warns of Mass Deception.

The emperor who gets scammed by a pair of con-artists is a cautionary children’s tale about a swindle which, like all scams, relies upon the psychological manipulation of the target. It is a story in which the swindle permeates down from the king, through his courtiers and into the general population. When the truth is revealed by a boy crying, “Look, the king is as naked as the day that he was born!”, the people snap out of the mass hypnosis.

The Covid1984 psyop is a darker version of the classic fable in which the king (emperor) and his advisors fall prey to a scam. The scam being that only he and his cohorts are capable of appreciating a tailored set of clothes which do not factually exist. In the tale, the swindlers emphasise that only those with intelligence can see the garments.

In the UK’s Covid1984 version of the fable, the lies of the false narrative are peddled by the majority of the 650 members of parliament via press conferences and a compliant media that simply regurgitates the lies. All of it is to the detriment of the people’s psychological health. This is deliberate. 

It is psychological manipulation, #GasLighting – whereby the target (the people) is slowly but surely being driven mad by the lies of the psychotic perpetrator (UK ‘gov’ who are under the instruction of the ‘tailors’, those who stitch together the material falsehoods of the narrative that there is a ‘pandemic’).

Matt Hancock, Boris Johnson, Dominic Cummings, Patrick Vallance and Chris Whitty are those courtiers who perpetrate the lies of the shadowy ‘tailors’. Whenever any of those mouthpieces for their globalist masters opens his mouth he ignores the facts and spouts on oblivious to the truth. In a way, it is a form of Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NDP), a pathological mental condition that requires a fake narrative, as produced by the mind of the narcissist himself. It is a fake state of mind in which the individual falsely believes his understanding is correct and not open to any kind of healthy debate. 

Who are the tailors? In the case of Covid1984, it is a case of following the money. The international banks are behind the lockdown and the masquerade. For the perfect exemplar, the president of Belarusia was apparently subject to a bribe from World Bank, IMF : introduce these measures and you will qualify for a ‘loan’ of over $900m: 

“Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko said last month via Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA., that World Bank and IMF offered him a bribe of $940 million USD in the form of “Covid Relief Aid.” In exchange for $940 million USD, the World Bank and IMF demanded that the President of Belarus: 

• imposed “extreme lockdown on his people”

• force them to wear face masks

• impose very strict curfews

• impose a police state

• crash the economy

Source: ZeroHedge

Inevitably, the House of Rothschild has it extensive tentacles all over it. From their total dominance of the financial systems to their apparent patenting of the Covid1984 testing kits: 

Source 

In the words of Henry Makow PhD, who likens it to another children’s of cruel deception:

Time to grow up and face reality. The West has been totally subverted by a satanist cult of pedophiles installed by the Rothschild banking cartel. He who pays the piper calls the tune.

Our feckless ancestors handed over the national credit cards to our worse enemies, bankers who happen to be Freemasons (Cabalists, Satanists.)

Most of our political and cultural leaders are witting or unwitting shills for the Rothschilds. They are traitors.

The Rothschild’s goal is to extend their monopoly over credit creation (currency) to a worldwide monopoly over everything: Power. Wealth. Culture. Thought. Behaviour. We’re talking about total control. This is the essence of Communism and the NWO.

The popular image of Communism as defender of the poor is nonsense. Communism was financed by the Rothschilds to blackmail plunder and destroy their rivals.” Source

The king is naked.

Those who see through it are akin to the boy in the story who calls out the naked emperor for a fool and all those duped ‘grown-ups’ who have gone along with the fake narrative. The exposure of the lie that there is such a thing as CovidNineteen is the same. As more and more see through it the cry goes up that the controllers are naked. 

What do Johnson and the others complicit in the swindle do? They try to cover up the lie with another lie, or deflection: thus we see the fake rise in rates as a result of a fake test, more local draconian measures and a mandatory mask wearing. However, if one owns one’s own body, how could mask wearing ever be mandatory? The psyop is saying, ‘Put a veil over your face, you are a disgrace.’

Unsurprisingly to those who are paying attention, Whitty and Vallance are being well-rewarded for their playing their part in the Covid1984 psycho-drama:

 The false narrative has always been dependent upon the incidence of ‘Covid Cases’. This is the way the cycle of lies goes:

  1. Set up a testing centre in a town or city.
  2. Encourage people to go and get ‘tested’ even if they are asymptomatic.
  3. Publish the fake results (93% false positives)
  4. Impose draconian local lockdown.
  5. Rinse and repeat.

This photo is of one such (fake) testing centre in Nottingham:

The fake narrative is one of ‘increased Covid1984 cases’, which are used to justify the tyranny. The reality is thus:

The fabric comes apart on the examination of the facts – namely, the ’emperor is naked’. It is not the truth that causes the suffering; it is the lies of those who ‘tailor’ the narrative for the benefit of the swindlers.

On a positive note, those responsible for the perpetration of the fraud against the people are being held to account by way of a Private Criminal Prosecution:

“I have major progress to report. A senior barrister who specialises in private criminal prosecutions for fraud asked for a telephone appointment this afternoon, to talk about taking on the pandemic fraud case against all the MP’s who didn’t vote to end the Coronavirus Act 2020.

Having already read the summary of the case, as well as the Notice of Intended Private Criminal Prosecution they were all served last week, this is an emphatic indication that they recognise that the arguments have merit. Otherwise, it would have been a polite “thanks, but no thanks”.

In the event they take the case, they will first have to agree to take instructions from myself, rather than a firm of solicitors, which is the non-negotiable condition of the complainant’s engagement of their services.

However, the case is very simple to understand and prosecute – each MP intentionally relied upon [and then caused the People to rely upon], a series of false statements, which caused the deaths of untold thousands, destroyed the economy and enabled unaccountable and tyrannical government, in breach of section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006, the Treason Felony Act 1348 and articles 1 and 2 of the Bill of Rights 1689.

Watch this space for further details as they unfold and rest assured that when [not if] these allegations are presented in a criminal court, there is no jury that wouldn’t convict every MP, as charged.”

TheBernician

_____________________________________


Notice: ob_end_flush(): Failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/public/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5373