Salon owner facing £27,000 fine after quoting Magna Carta to defy lockdown
A salon owner who refused to close during England’s current lockdown has been given a £27,000 fine. Sinead Quinn, who runs Quin Blakey Hairdressers, was initially fined £1,000 for staying open after November 5.
She stayed open and further fines were issued. She tried to use the Magna Carta as a defence of her decision to stay open. However, the law she cited – Clause 61, offering 25 barons the right to lawfully dissent or rebel if they thought they were being governed unjustly – was repealed and never incorporated into English law.
Kirklees Council ordered her to pay £4,000 on Saturday and police issued another two £10,000 fines when she opened again on Monday and Tuesday.
Quinn had previously shared videos of herself arguing with council officials and police on Instagram. In one clip she could be seen telling them she didn’t consent to the ‘unlawful’ fines, and cited ‘common law’ in her defence. On Tuesday Quinn shared a picture of a police car outside the salon and captioned it: ‘This is what your tax paying money goes toward. Sitting outside my business whilst I’m lawfully earning a living.’ In another video she accused the police of ‘stalking’ her.
Hairdresser Sinead Quinn She previously put the Magna Carta up in the salon’s door (Picture: Instagram) Police fine the salon Officers have visited the salon twice this week (Picture: Bradford T&A / SWNS)
Kirklees is currently among the most infected areas in England, with a rate of 446.4 cases per 100,000 people in the seven days to November 19. The council said in a statement: ‘It is absolutely crucial for people’s safety that we all follow the latest Covid-19 rules and guidance. ‘Kirklees currently has the fifth highest rates in the country, with 135 people admitted to hospital last week and 25 sadly losing their lives to a Covid-19 related death.
The salon sign The Magna Carta can not be used as a defence in court (Picture: Bradford T&A / SWNS) Quinn Blakey Hairdressing, on Bradford Road, Oakenshaw is visited by two PCSOs as they appeared to be staying open in defiance of lockdown restrictiond, November 10 2020. See SWNS story SWLEhair.
A hair salon appears to have rebelled against the current lockdown rules by staying open despite the tightened coronavirus restrictions. Quinn Blakey Hairdressing, on Bradford Road, Oakenshaw, was seemingly open for business yesterday and at one point, police community support officers arrived at the premises.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson ordered certain businesses – including hairdressers – to close from November 5 in the face of rising Covid-19 cases. On the same day, a post on the salon?s Facebook page said: ?I earned this week?s rent today, not sure where I would be pulling that money from given the government want self employed business people to wait SIX WEEKS for a payment. She has received £27,000 in fines (Picture: Bradford T&A / SWNS)
‘The law set by the Government is there so we can bring infection rates down, ease pressure on our health services and save lives. ‘But it only works if we all stick to it and realise that no one is above the law. Frankly, the actions taken by this business are selfish and irresponsible. ‘We will not hesitate to take action on anyone who breaches the rules that are in place to keep us all safe. Repeated breaches of Covid-19 regulations result in ever increasing fines up to £10,000 and eventually prosecution.’
Parallels With Children’s Tale That Warns of Mass Deception.
The emperor who gets scammed by a pair of con-artists is a cautionary
children’s tale about a swindle which, like all scams, relies upon the
psychological manipulation of the target. It is a story in which the
swindle permeates down from the king, through his courtiers and into the
general population. When the truth is revealed by a boy crying, “Look,
the king is as naked as the day that he was born!”, the people snap out
of the mass hypnosis.
The Covid1984 psyop is a darker version of the classic fable in which
the king (emperor) and his advisors fall prey to a scam. The scam being
that only he and his cohorts are capable of appreciating a tailored set
of clothes which do not factually exist. In the tale, the swindlers
emphasise that only those with intelligence can see the garments.
In the UK’s Covid1984
version of the fable, the lies of the false narrative are peddled by
the majority of the 650 members of parliament via press conferences and a
compliant media that simply regurgitates the lies. All of it is to the
detriment of the people’s psychological health. This is deliberate.
It is psychological manipulation, #GasLighting
– whereby the target (the people) is slowly but surely being driven mad
by the lies of the psychotic perpetrator (UK ‘gov’ who are under the
instruction of the ‘tailors’, those who stitch together the material
falsehoods of the narrative that there is a ‘pandemic’).
Matt Hancock, Boris Johnson, Dominic Cummings, Patrick Vallance and
Chris Whitty are those courtiers who perpetrate the lies of the shadowy
‘tailors’. Whenever any of those mouthpieces for their globalist masters
opens his mouth he ignores the facts and spouts on oblivious to the
truth. In a way, it is a form of Narcissistic Personality Disorder
(NDP), a pathological mental condition that requires a fake narrative,
as produced by the mind of the narcissist himself. It is a fake state of
mind in which the individual falsely believes his understanding is
correct and not open to any kind of healthy debate.
Who are the tailors? In the case of Covid1984, it is a case of following the money.
The international banks are behind the lockdown and the masquerade. For
the perfect exemplar, the president of Belarusia was apparently subject
to a bribe from World Bank, IMF : introduce these measures and you will
qualify for a ‘loan’ of over $900m:
“Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko said last
month via Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA., that World Bank and IMF
offered him a bribe of $940 million USD in the form of “Covid Relief
Aid.” In exchange for $940 million USD, the World Bank and IMF demanded
that the President of Belarus:
Inevitably, the House of Rothschild has it extensive tentacles all
over it. From their total dominance of the financial systems to their
apparent patenting of the Covid1984 testing kits:
In the words of Henry Makow PhD, who likens it to another children’s of cruel deception:
“Time to grow up and face reality. The West has
been totally subverted by a satanist cult of pedophiles installed by the
Rothschild banking cartel. He who pays the piper calls the tune.
Our feckless ancestors handed over the national credit cards to our
worse enemies, bankers who happen to be Freemasons (Cabalists,
Satanists.)
Most of our political and cultural leaders are witting or unwitting shills for the Rothschilds. They are traitors.
The Rothschild’s goal is to extend their monopoly over credit creation (currency) to a worldwide monopoly over everything: Power. Wealth. Culture. Thought. Behaviour. We’re talking about total control. This is the essence of Communism and the NWO.
The popular image of Communism as defender of the poor is nonsense.
Communism was financed by the Rothschilds to blackmail plunder and
destroy their rivals.” Source
The king is naked.
Those who see through it are akin to the boy in the story who calls
out the naked emperor for a fool and all those duped ‘grown-ups’ who
have gone along with the fake narrative. The exposure of the lie that
there is such a thing as CovidNineteen is the same. As more and more see
through it the cry goes up that the controllers are naked.
What do Johnson and the others complicit in the swindle do? They try
to cover up the lie with another lie, or deflection: thus we see the
fake rise in rates as a result of a fake test, more local draconian
measures and a mandatory mask wearing. However, if one owns one’s own
body, how could mask wearing ever be mandatory? The psyop is saying,
‘Put a veil over your face, you are a disgrace.’
Unsurprisingly to those who are paying attention, Whitty and Vallance
are being well-rewarded for their playing their part in the Covid1984
psycho-drama:
The false narrative has always been dependent upon the incidence of ‘Covid Cases’. This is the way the cycle of lies goes:
Set up a testing centre in a town or city.
Encourage people to go and get ‘tested’ even if they are asymptomatic.
Publish the fake results (93% false positives)
Impose draconian local lockdown.
Rinse and repeat.
This photo is of one such (fake) testing centre in Nottingham:
The fake narrative is one of ‘increased Covid1984 cases’, which are used to justify the tyranny. The reality is thus:
The fabric comes apart on the examination of the facts – namely, the
’emperor is naked’. It is not the truth that causes the suffering; it is
the lies of those who ‘tailor’ the narrative for the benefit of the
swindlers.
On a positive note, those responsible for the perpetration of the
fraud against the people are being held to account by way of a Private
Criminal Prosecution:
“I have major progress to report. A senior barrister who
specialises in private criminal prosecutions for fraud asked for a
telephone appointment this afternoon, to talk about taking on the
pandemic fraud case against all the MP’s who didn’t vote to end the
Coronavirus Act 2020.
Having already read the summary of the case, as well as the Notice of
Intended Private Criminal Prosecution they were all served last week,
this is an emphatic indication that they recognise that the arguments
have merit. Otherwise, it would have been a polite “thanks, but no
thanks”.
In the event they take the case, they will first have to agree to
take instructions from myself, rather than a firm of solicitors, which
is the non-negotiable condition of the complainant’s engagement of their
services.
However, the case is very simple to understand and prosecute – each
MP intentionally relied upon [and then caused the People to rely upon], a
series of false statements, which caused the deaths of untold
thousands, destroyed the economy and enabled unaccountable and
tyrannical government, in breach of section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006, the
Treason Felony Act 1348 and articles 1 and 2 of the Bill of Rights
1689.
Watch this space for further details as they unfold and rest assured
that when [not if] these allegations are presented in a criminal court,
there is no jury that wouldn’t convict every MP, as charged.”
