On February 21st<\/sup> 2024, I went in to the Provincial Court at Victoria and submitted a private Information. The 5 counts are spelled-out below.\u00a0\u00a0 Justice of the Peace P Braz\u00a0\u00a0 endorsed my complaint.\u00a0\u00a0 He then asked me to provide more information for the Crown Counsel.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 I came back a day later and handed in the 3 letters which I had previously sent to Deputy Attorney General Peter Juk, head of the Prosecution Service. The letters recited the facts, including the transcript of the ZOOM call in which leaders of the labour unions in Canada declared they would\u00a0 DISRUPT \u00a0DISTURB \u00a0DEMORALIZE rallies planned by the #1 Million March 4 Children. That transcript is hard evidence of criminal conspiracy to commit indictable offences.\u00a0\u00a0 Mr Juk \u00a0never replied.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0
JP Braz set down the matter to be heard in Court April 17th<\/sup> 2024 to fix a date for the next stage in the process.\u00a0
After an Information is laId,\u00a0 the Informant appears before that Justice of the Peace, or, a judge of the Provincial Court, for a Process hearing in camera.\u00a0\u00a0 Meaning : closed to the public.\u00a0 After hearing the complainant and his witnesses,\u00a0\u00a0 the judge decides if a case has been made out sufficient for it to go ahead to trial.\u00a0 If so,\u00a0 he or she directs the Registrar to put the matter on the Court List.\u00a0
Over the last 40 years, I have laid a couple dozen private Informations.\u00a0 Out of them,\u00a0
4 times my complaint did go for a full hearing. A few of them proceeded to trials, out of which came a couple of convictions.
I have been through more than a couple of Process hearings\u00a0 So I know how it goes. Or, how it\u2019s supposed to go.\u00a0\u00a0 On\u00a0 February 29th<\/sup> 2024 Kimberley Henders Miller Deputy Regional Crown Counsel notified me that she had directed my charges to be \u2018stayed\u2019.
the Judicial Review tells the court that I have been denied my right to due process of law.\u00a0 As well,\u00a0 that the Criminal Justice Branch cannot treat this matter fairly because of perceived conflict of interest :ie.\u00a0 that the Prosecution Service is fully entrained in the mind-set of the administration of the day ( the NDP government )\u00a0 which assumes the mental illness of A-pot-em-no-philia is \u2018normal\u2019.\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0So that those of us who assert our political and \/or religious opinion out loud,\u00a0 are breaching the Civil Rights Code.\u00a0 Result being : the government agency which ought to prosecute those who carried on a criminal conspiracy to \u201cDISRUPT\u00a0 \u00a0DESTROY \u00a0\u00a0DEMORALIZE\u201d\u00a0 ( as they boasted in their ZOOM call, 2 weeks in advance of the riot ) instead, protects the offenders from accountability at law in order to save the government from embarrassment.\u00a0
I am asking those of you who were profoundly offended by the riot to prepare a written statement of what you recall happened on the lawn of the Legislature,\u00a0 on September 20th<\/sup> 2023.\u00a0 Your statement can be as long as you like.\u00a0 Then get it to me.\u00a0 It will form part of the Materials to be relied upon\u00a0 in my Petition for Judicial Review.
I am not a lawyer.\u00a0 I do not pretend to be a lawyer. I do not take $$s for legal advice. Feel free to contact me to help you put together a \u201cwill say\u201d statement.\u00a0 If you want to,\u00a0 your witness statement can be made in to an Affidavit, \u00a0then,\u00a0 sworn at the Registry counter for $40.\u00a0\u00a0 Photographs and\/or significant items\/ documents can be attached to it as Exhibits in order to get them in as evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
……………………………………………………………………………………. CANADA:<\/p>\n\n\n\n PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA<\/p>\n\n\n\n PROVINCE DE LA COLOMBIE-BRITANNIQUE<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the Provincial Court of British Columbia In the matter of An Act respecting the criminal law<\/em><\/strong> RSC 1985 Chapter C-46<\/p>\n\n\n\n Form 2<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is the Information of \/ les presents constituent la denonciation de Gordon Stephen Watson, politician, (\u201cthe informant\u201d \/ le denonciateur ) of \/ de Metchosin British Columbia, hereinafter called the Informant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Count 1 : The Informant says that he has reasonable and probable grounds to believe and does believe that: on September 16th<\/sup> 2023 via a conference call in which some of its participants were in British Columbia, BC FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ; BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; BC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNION doing business as BC GEU ; RON HALPIN ; ONTARIO FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; PATTY JARVIS COATES ; CHANDRA\u2013LI PAUL ; VICKI SMALLMAN ; CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS ; YOLANDA B\u2019DACY ; MARTIN REILLY ; EMILY QUAILE ; PETER VEITCH ; CAROLYN EGAN ; ANTHONY MARCO ; MUNIB SJJAD ; DON FRY ; CUPE ONTARIO ; SUSAN GAPKA ; JOHN DOE ; JANE DOE did agree one with another to counsel commission of crimes at places across Canada, particularly, the grounds of the Legislature in Victoria, thus engaging in a conspiracy to commit an indictable offence, to wit, common nuisance contrary to sections 465 and 180 of the Criminal Code<\/em><\/strong>. <\/em><\/strong> Count 2 : The Informant says that he has reasonable and probable grounds to believe and does believe that: on September 16th<\/sup> 2023 via a conference call in which some participants were in British Columbia, BC FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ;BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; BC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNION doing business as BC GEU ; RON HALPIN ; ONTARIO FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; PATTY JARVIS COATES ; CHANDRA\u2013LI PAUL ; VICKI SMALLMAN ; CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS ; YOLANDA B\u2019DACY ; MARTIN REILLY ; EMILY QUAILE ; PETER VEITCH ; CAROLYN EGAN ; ANTHONY MARCO ; MUNIB SJJAD ; DON FRY ; CUPE ONTARIO ; SUSAN GAPKA ; JOHN DOE ; JANE DOE did agree one with another to counsel commission of crimes at places across Canada, particularly, the grounds of the Legislature in Victoria, thus engaging in a conspiracy to commit an indictable offence, to wit, wilfully disturbing or interupting an assemblage of persons met for moral, social or benevolent purpose, contrary to sections 465 and 176 of the Criminal Code<\/em><\/strong>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Count 3 : The Informant says that he believes on reasonable grounds that on September 20th<\/sup> 2023 WINONA WALDRON ; BC FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ; BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; BC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNION doing business as BC GEU, via their union members, agents and\/or employees, did make common nuisance on the grounds of the Legislature in Victoria, and that they did so deliberately to compel him to abstain from his lawful right to participate in the democratic process, contrary to section 180 of the Criminal Code<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Count 4 : The Informant says that he believes on reasonable grounds that on September 20th<\/sup> 2023 WINONA WALDRON ; BC FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ; BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; BC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNION doing business as BC GEU, via their union members, agents and\/or employees, did make common nuisance on the grounds of the Legislature in Victoria, and that they did so deliberately to compel him to abstain from his lawful right to assemble peacefully with other citizens, contrary to section 180 of the Criminal Code<\/em><\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Count 5 : The Informant says that he believes on reasonable grounds that on September 20th<\/sup> 2023 on the grounds of the Legislature in Victoria _______________Signed by Gordon S Watson _________________________ Dated \/ Fait le February 21st 2024 A. D.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At Victoria British Columbia \/ Colombie-Britannique<\/p>\n\n\n\n Process \/ Acte de procedure ________ confirmed<\/p>\n\n\n\n Signed by P Bray<\/p>\n\n\n\n _______________<\/p>\n\n\n\n A Justice of the Peace in and for the Province of British Columbia surface mail address : Telephone 250 39 1 1103 I have not forgotten the insult visited on us at the riot at the Legislature. A mob of urban terrorist counter-protesters ruined the gathering at which speakers were informing the public about the IN-sanity of the SOGI program. The head … Continue reading
What I want is, for a Justice of the Supreme Court to hear me out in a proper Process Hearing. Especially, for witnesses to each take the stand to corroborate my charges. At that stage, the thing is public. Publicity is the soul of Justice
Gordon S Watson May 11th<\/sup> 2024<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Court Identifier 187706-1
<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/gordon-watson-protesting-4.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/h1>\n\n\n\n
INFORMATION<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
WINONA WALDRON ; BC FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ; BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; BC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNION doing business as BC GEU, via their union members, agents and\/or employees ; JOHN DOE ; JANE DOE did intimidate him and others and that aforementioned ACCUSED did so to compel him to abstain from his lawful right to participate in the democratic process, contrary to section 423 of the Criminal Code<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/td> <\/td> <\/td> <\/td><\/tr> <\/td> Pursuant to section 508 1. (2) of the Criminal Code and\/or section 13.1 of the Offence Act<\/em> ( British Columbia) the Informant states that all matters contained in this Information are true tomy knowledge and belief <\/td> <\/td> Suivant le paragraphse 508.1 (2) du Code criminal et \/ ou l\u2019article 13. 1 de l\u2019Offence Act<\/em> (Colombie-Britannique), le denonciateur declare croit vrais, au meileur de sa connaissance, les renseignements contenus dans la denonciation. <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Signature of Informant \/ Signature du denonciateur
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\/ Un juge de paix, dans et pour la province de la Colombie-Britannique<\/p>\n\n\n\n
#4 5177 William Head Road Metchosin British Columbia V9C 4H5<\/p>\n\n\n\n
email < watson.gordons@gmail.com<\/a> >
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"