Speech and the Internet in Our Lifetime \u2013 Bill C63<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mischievously entitled the \u201cOnline Harms Act\u201d, Bill C-63
introduced in Parliament February 26 is the most serious threat
to freedom of speech in our lifetime. You MUST act. Contact by
mail, phone, but preferably by going and seeing your MP of
whatever party. Insist that this Stalinist bill be withdrawn or
defeated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We\u2019ll provide further details in the next issue of the Free Speech
Monitor, but here are some of the worst highlights:
\uf0b7 Remember Stalin\u2019s Russia made anti-Semitism
punishable by death. Well, , by an amendment to the
\u201chate law\u201d (Section 318) will make advocating genocide
punishable by up to life \u2013 yes, you read that right, LIFE
\u2013 in prison. All that for running your mouth on the
Internet. Only capital murder and treason can get you
life in prison. Crimes where people, not the feelings of
privileged groups, are hurt (assault, wounding) don\u2019t get
you life in prison. Remember that. after the Israel\/Gaza
war, genocide has become a loosey goosey concept.
Many Zionists insist the slogan \u201cfrom the river to the
sea, Palestine shall be free\u201d is a call for genocide.
Clearly the mass bombing, starvation and displacement
of the people in Gaza might be seen as such.
\uf0b7<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Punch someone in the nose and you could go to prison The Act says: \u201cEveryone who commits an offence under this Act Section 13 is back! It took more than a decade to get Commission may deal with a complaint in relation to a You MUST Act Now: The Biggest Threat to FreeSpeech and the Internet in Our Lifetime \u2013 Bill C63 Mischievously entitled the \u201cOnline Harms Act\u201d, Bill C-63introduced in Parliament February 26 is the most serious threatto freedom of speech in our … Continue reading
for life! No kidding. Kim Jong-Un could take lessons
in repression from the ungrateful Ugandan Asian Arif
Virani, who, as Trudeau\u2019s Minister of \u201cJustice\u201d, repaid
Canada\u2019s hospitality after Idi Amin expelled his family,
with this piece of police state thought control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/ARIF-VIRANI.jpeg\")
<\/a>
or any other Act of Parliament, if the commission of the
offence is motivated by hatred based on race, national
or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age,
mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or
gender identity or expression, is guilty of an indictable
offence and liable to imprisonment for life.\u201d So,
supposing someone cuts you off while you are driving.
You jump out of your car, cuss them out and punch
them in the nose. You go to court for assault causing
bodily harm. Today, you\u2019d likely get a fine or a month
in jail. HOWEVER, if you denounced the bad driver as
a homosexual or blind Chinaman, your act might be
seen as being motivated by hate against a privileged
group and you could face life in prison. Move over, Paul
Bernardo, another thought criminal will join you in jail.
\uf0b7<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Parliament to rescind Section 13 of the Canadian
Human Rights Act. It was used to punish people whose
views on the Internet were \u201clikely to expose to hatred
or contempt\u201d members of privileged groups \u2013 race,
religion, sex, sexual orientation. That protection did not
apply to White people or Christians as the Supreme
Court made clear in its 2012 Whatcott ruling. Only
\u201cminorities\u201d are protected. Well, Sec. 13 is back worse
than ever. The Ugandan has trashed basic rights of
Anglo-Saxon law. You may be the victim on an
anonymous complaint. Your ancient right to face your
accuser has just flown out the window: \u201cThe<\/p>\n\n\n\n
discriminatory practice described in Section 13 without
disclosing, to the person against whom the complaint
was filed or to any other person, the identity of the
alleged victim, the individual or group of individuals
that has filed the complaint or any individual who has
given evidence or assisted the Commission in any way
in dealing with the complaint, if the Commission
considers that there is a real and substantial risk that
any of those individuals will be subjected to threats,
intimidation or discrimination.\u201d You can be fined up to
$70,000 for your views. Oh, yes, and remember: Truth
is no defence, as Ernst Zundel found out in the
Zundelsite tribunal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There\u2019s even more state control and tyranny, but we\u2019ll save that
for the next issue.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"