![\"Trudeau\"\/](\"https:\/\/smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital\/nationalpost\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/AFP_33UL9JL.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=288&h=216&sig=O6zuVaXHSew0Le786vsvHQ\")
Some of those reading this column will know that I have been ordered by the Ontario College of Psychologists to undergo \u201csocial media re-training\u201d of indeterminate length, as a consequence of expressing my opinions publicly, with the specified outcome of my comprehensive compliance, as judged by my re-educators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The charges levied against me include re-tweeting a tweet by the Leader of the Official Opposition in Canada (are you listening, \u201cconservatives\u201d?), criticizing Justin Trudeau and a diverse number of his minions, and expressing skepticism about the doom-saying fear-mongering tyranny-promoting chicken-little prognostications of the eco-fascists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Why should Canadians care? If you\u2019re a miner, and the canary caged next to you asphyxiates, you don\u2019t blame the bird for being there. You notice that the air has become toxic, and you make tracks for the surface. Regulated professionals, subject to the petty tyranny of their overseeing agencies, are now starting to gasp and choke. Them first \u2014 you, next.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It\u2019s already true in Canada that lawyers cannot have the reasonable certainty they once had with regard to the outcome of the cases they are pursuing, relying as they once did on precedent and the common or even civil law. Instead, they have to be prepared to be subjected to the opinions of an increasingly activist court, whose members have taken it upon themselves to put forward what is essentially a radical leftist (\u201cprogressive\u201d) agenda. It\u2019s true that physicians and teachers are so afraid to say what they think that even the reasonable among them no longer dare to tell the truth to the patients and children they serve. How do I know this? Because they tell me so. And how well do Canadians presume that the professionals they need will serve them, when they have all been cowed into, at best, liars of silence?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And why should Canadians believe in the existence and operation of such an agenda, rather than (comfortingly) passing such suggestions off as the ranting of demented, conspiratorially-minded right wingers, such as myself?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here are a couple of facts (remember those?) simultaneously indisputable and unpleasant: Our \u201cMinister of the Environment and Climate Change,\u201d Steven Guilbeault, was not only a radical leftist activist, in his previous incarnation, but is now simultaneously savaging the economy of Western Canada, upon whose revenue his home province of Quebec shamefully, ungratefully and resentfully depends upon, while he works directly with the Chinese Communist Party, rulers of a country building more coal plants every year (two a week) than the rest of the world combined; six times more, to be precise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He is doing that while rumours of CCP influence over the Canadian electoral process abound (!), under the supervision of a prime minister who has explicitly expressed admiration for the efficiency of communist tyranny, who was a friend to the demented tyrant who ran Cuba as his private fiefdom for decades. That would be Fidel Castro, bosom buddy as well as to Trudeau senior, and the same man who told former president Jimmy Carter that he would have sacrificed his whole island paradise to nuclear annihilation by our American allies just to move the Soviet agenda forward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He is doing that under the rainbow-festooned banner of a \u201cLiberal\u201d party that has moved so far to the left that the hapless socialist NDP has nothing whatsoever left to offer (particularly labouring as they do under Jagmeet Singh, the most hypocritical politician Canada has ever coughed onto dry land. He is an empty suit of designer clothes too incompetent even to have bargained for the cabinet seat that is the going price, on the world market, for a politician\u2019s soul).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He is doing that as part of an administration that is an express supporter of the deadly doctrine of Diversity, Inclusivity and Equity, the mask that the wolves of compassion wear while they open the throats of the idiot sheep who think they are supporting all that is good and true. Equity: there\u2019s a basket of snakes. What does equity mean? The useful idiots of the moderate left insist that it\u2019s just a synonym for \u201cequality of opportunity.\u201d Why the new word, then, thinkers on the liberal side?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Equity means something very particular, good Canadians. It means that all economic and social systems that do not produce precise equality of outcomes across all possible measures of human difference (race, ethnicity, sex, \u201cgender,\u201d age, health status, ability, you name it) are to be regarded as \u201csystemically prejudiced\u201d and utterly re-tooled, in a revolutionary manner. What\u2019s wrong with that, you ask, thinking of the excluded and the \u201cmarginalized,\u201d in that manner so sympathetic endlessly and conveniently deserving of praise; considering yourself, despite your lack of actual effort on their behalf, a friend of the poor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- Jordan Peterson: I will risk my licence to escape social media re-education<\/a><\/li>
- Jordan Peterson: Why I am no longer a tenured professor at the University of Toronto<\/a><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n
Let me ask you a straightforward question: do you own anything? A cell phone, perhaps; maybe a car; possibly even an apartment or house (although that is increasingly unlikely, particularly for young people, in Trudeau\u2019s socialist paradise). Does that not mean that other people (the same marginalized; the same poor) don\u2019t own that phone, that car, that house? Are you not therefore excluding them? The answer to that question, by the way, is \u201cyes.\u201d Of course you\u2019re bloody well excluding them \u2014 oppressing them, marginalizing them, with your exclusive access to what you have hypothetically worked to earn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cProperty is theft\u201d: no shortage of barely successful peasants such as yourself have died as a consequence of that clich\u00e9. How did societies get themselves to that point? By adopting the doctrine of equity, which is now deemed a mandatory belief by the professional organizations that regulate lawyers, physicians, psychologists, accountants, engineer and teachers (and that is not nearly all) in Canada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Equity is no different than communism, boys and girls. Wait: let me clarify, as that is an error, but not in the direction you think. It\u2019s far worse than mere communism. Marx had nothing on the post-modernists, who now occupy the universities, and have dramatically expanded upon his dread and murderous vision. Marx viewed oppression as essentially one-dimensional: the proletariat (that\u2019s the poor for those of you who went through Canada\u2019s \u201ceducation\u201d system and still don\u2019t know even that) were exploited by the \u201cbourgeoisie\u201d (that turns out to be \u201canyone who owns anything at all\u201d). That has happened forever; that\u2019s all you really need to know about history and human social relationships in general; and it has to stop. By any means necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Hence the hundred million or so deaths at the hands of the compassionate progressives in the 20th century. Of course, that wasn\u2019t real communism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You can tell, because some people were accidentally left standing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For the postmodernists whose theories now dominate the academy and, increasingly, the western world, the bitter resentment of Marx was just the beginning. The concept of oppression is now limitlessly multi-dimensional. Everyone has become a victim, because of their height, their weight, their lack of attractiveness or athletic ability, their country of origin, their religious belief, the status of their ancestors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What\u2019s the problem with that? After all, life is hard, and much is distributed unfairly. Well, when everyone is a victim, everyone also becomes, perforce, an oppressor \u2014 and the punishment for that is severe. Maybe you\u2019re a bit fat (victim, victim), but you\u2019re white, or the tan that we now call brown that could become white in a flash. Presto! You\u2019re a perpetrator. Maybe you don\u2019t own a house (victim, victim). But you own a rusty old wreck from the 90s. Compared to those who can only afford a bicycle (perhaps because they\u2019re useless layabouts) you are definitely an oppressor. Perhaps you\u2019re genuinely poor (victim victim), but you\u2019re young. You can be certain that you are then at least afflicted by implicit ageism, and your very youth a mark of at least your unconscious bias and general shameful reprehensibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Are you beginning to understand the game? I doubt it. It\u2019s much easier for Canadians to keep their sheep\/ostrich-heads firmly in the sand, and assume that anyone pointing out not so much what\u2019s going on but what\u2019s already happened is an extremist, a bigot, a right-wing conspiracy theorist, a Confederate sympathizer (in Canada (!)), a MAGA Republican, hell-bent for God only knows what possible reason on overthrowing Canadian democracy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As if they bloody well care.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As if they even know where Canada is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Why am I fighting the college? Probably because I\u2019m stupid, or at least, as a Canadian journalist so famously put it, \u201cthe stupid person\u2019s smart person.\u201d Touch\u00e9. Seriously (although all educators are, perforce, the stupid people\u2019s smart person). But I have plenty of money, and a wife I love, and a family that supports me, and friends that do as well, and the opportunity to live anywhere I want to in the world, and have been informed by those who run other political jurisdictions that they would restore my licence in a heart-beat if the low-level schemers in eternally good-thinking Ontario manage to purloin it, as they probably will. I really don\u2019t need the hassle, to say nothing of the literally tens of thousands of dollars it costs per month to keep the vipers at bay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The process is the punishment, as those who have successfully weaponized many such deep-state bureaucracies know full well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I am doing it to bring to the attention of Canadians \u2014 and, if not Canadians, whose smug self-complacency is perhaps unparalleled in the world (except maybe in comparison to the Kiwis or the liberal Californians) \u2014 then to people elsewhere in the West, increasingly inclined as they are to see what is happening in Canada, just as intelligent miners see their canaries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We\u2019re at the edge of the terrible transformation that is occurring everywhere in the free world. As Canada goes, so hope the progressives, the world goes. Thus, the good fight might as well be fought here. I have a son, a daughter-in-law, and grandchildren in this benighted country. My parents live here. My daughter departed for freer lands, and I won\u2019t forgive the current administration for that. Her example is tempting, and I\u2019ve lived in the United States before \u2014 but the same problem exists among our neighbours to the south, despite their more extensive commitment to the freedom that has vanished with amazing rapidity in the Great White North.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is not that freedom of speech is threatened in Canada, by the way, good people. It\u2019s that it\u2019s already pretty much gone \u2014 although, God willing, not permanently. The same can be said for freedom of conscience and association. We gave up freedom of mobility under Trudeau, which was the only freedom he could directly threaten, in his attempt to (successfully) divide Canadians, and therefore promptly did.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We still have the freedom to pretend that everything is just as it was 20 or even 10 years ago. But it\u2019s not. The fact that I am being persecuted for criticizing the prime minister, for passing on the opinions of Pierre Poilievre, and for doubting the opinions of that veritable traitor, Steven Guilbeault, is a primary indication of that. My case would not be attracting the international attention that it is \u2014 as is the prosecution of the Trucker Convoy leaders, whose protest was widely admired outside this country \u2014 if that was not the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Why should you care? It\u2019s not about me, folks. I have options.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You don\u2019t.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But I\u2019m still inclined to fight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
How about you?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Jordan Peterson: Trudeau and the equity tyrants must be stopped We\u2019re at the edge of the terrible transformation that is occurring everywhere in the free world Author of the article: Jordan Peterson Published Sep 11, 2023 \u2022 Last updated 2 days … Continue reading
- Jordan Peterson: Why I am no longer a tenured professor at the University of Toronto<\/a><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n