He declined, saying: \u2018You\u2019re carrying on a lawful protest\u2019. Yet, I did sense that if I\u2019d pushed the envelope, I would\u2019ve talked myself into one. So I backed off. I said \u201cI don’t need one. I had an incident on the ferries this week which is a good set of facts for challenging the govt. policy about masks\u201d Nodding towards the Law courts building, visible just down the way, I said \u201cI\u2019ll be in court with it. I know police officers aren\u2019t interested in hearing about the law\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
To his credit, he replied \u201cI am interested in the law\u201d….. so I reeled-off section 103 of the Public Health Act<\/em><\/strong>. Explaining right there is the defence to the strict liability offence created by Bonnie Henry\u2019s Order re EVENTS AND GATHERINGS. He did not say anything more, yet I got the impression that he was thinking for himself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I\u2019ve been at the big anti-lockdown Events in BC, plus several small ones. There has been no major blowback. An occasional cat-call that we are \u201cfools\u201d, but that\u2019s all. My sense, is, the zombies going by with their fashion-statement muzzles on tight, are confounded by public presence of so many ordinary folks, organized, boldly contradicting official propaganda. At this stage of this authentic populist movement, provoking an individual to reconsider the Central Party Line is what we\u2019re about. Human beings go in-sane in herds. They come to their senses one at a time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In Kelowna and Nanaimo, the RCMP have handed out notices alleging violations of the Public Health Act Order to people gathered to protest govt. policy. Sgt. Roberts was the officer in charge on-site at the first big rally in Vancouver last September. When I asked him if they were going to hand out Violation Notices, he said : \u201cwe decided not to issue tickets today because the Charter is above the Public Health Act<\/em>\u201d direct quote<\/p>\n\n\n\n To a certain extent, we have The Man with the Gun on our side. The Victoria and Vancouver Police do not charge us because they have received legal counsel, advising them that our GATHERINGS are Charter-protected political activity<\/p>\n\n\n\n The human mind has a miraculous innate logic programme. The contrast between thousands of peaceful people, marching through the downtowns of major cities in BC, cops escorting our marches rather than bothering us, versus nonsense purveyed on the lamestream media — images of thugs in uniform bullying individuals who are just going about daily life — works away at the consciences of ordinary citizens. Something\u2019s gotta give.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As for the argument out of section 103, it\u2019s important to realize that under the previous Health Act<\/strong><\/em>, there had to be evidence to support an Order. But the new statute changed it so that onus is now on the Accused, to prove his innocence. One more detail telling that British Columbia now suffers under communist tyranny. The way it\u2019s going, I expect to be making this argument before a Judge. I sincerely do believe<\/strong> that the entire SARS-2-Covid19 extravaganza is medical malpractice \u2018of the first water<\/em>\u2019 : a HOAX. <\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n At such a trial, I will be submitting hundreds of articles grabbed from the Internet, written by world-class experts, undoing the very premise for the Order of that Head Witch, namely Bonnie Henry. Any half-way intelligent person, with integrity to honestly examine such items, must conclude that there is mass psychosis upon the land. Section 103 of the Public Health Act<\/em><\/strong> Revised Statutes of British Columbia<\/p>\n\n\n\n Defences<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 103<\/strong> A person must not be convicted of an offence under this Act if the person proves that he or she<\/p>\n\n\n\n (a) exercised due diligence by taking all reasonable steps to avoid committing the offence,<\/p>\n\n\n\n (b) reasonably believed in the existence of facts that, if true, would establish that the person did not contravene this Act or a regulation made under it,<\/p>\n\n\n\n (c) relied on information or an instruction provided to the person by a health officer who was exercising a power or performing a duty under this Act, if the person had no reason to believe that the information may have been false or the instruction may have been unauthorized, or<\/p>\n\n\n\n (d) acted under the order of a health officer who was exercising a power or performing a duty under this Act, if the person had no reason to believe that the order may have been unauthorized under this Act or any other enactment. — Gordon Watson TO > those who care about good government in British Columbia When my old man was at the Dominion War College in 1942, he was taught \u201csometimes getting shot at is the best intel. you can get\u201d. That was demonstrated … Continue reading
Wrong is put in place of right : Right is called Wrong. And the man who calleth for Justice, maketh himself a prey<\/u><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"