{"id":3701,"date":"2020-03-23T04:32:25","date_gmt":"2020-03-23T08:32:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/?p=3701"},"modified":"2020-03-23T04:32:25","modified_gmt":"2020-03-23T08:32:25","slug":"sweden-anti-white-totalitarianism-and-the-death-of-free-speech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/?p=3701","title":{"rendered":"Sweden: Anti-White Totalitarianism and the Death of Free Speech"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Sweden: Anti-White Totalitarianism and the Death of Free Speech<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
$\"Chris$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Chris Rossetti<\/a>\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\n\t\t\u00b7\n\n\t\t 19 January, 2020<\/a>\n\t\t\t 4\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
by Simon Lindberg<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Nordic people\u2019s constitutional freedoms and rights are being \n abolished. Repression against critics of the system is increasing. The \n situation is starting to get very serious\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
THE MEDIA, politicians and celebrities in Sweden (in other words, the\n entire establishment) often talk about the lack of \u201cdemocracy\u201d in \nother countries. They speak with condemnation about totalitarian states\n and citizens who cannot say or think what they want, about the \nshameful treatment of the opposition by the ruling regime, and about \npolice who violently retaliate against public protests and \ninvestigative journalists. We hear it about Russia, Syria, Venezuela, \nIran and China, just like we heard it before about countries like Libya\n and Iraq.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This article will not attempt to provide an account of the conditions\n in these countries or concern itself with the veracity of the \nestablishment\u2019s reporting on them. Instead we will examine what the \nsituation looks like in Sweden. This country is nowhere near as free as \n the system would like people to believe \u2014 the rights and privileges of \n dissident Swedish citizens have been completely decimated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In recent years, freedom of expression has been restricted more and \nmore in Sweden. At present the establishment is discussing how both \nfreedom of association and the freedom to demonstrate can be limited. \nNaturally, the ones being impacted and feeling the effects are those who\n go against the state and the establishment \u2014 i.e., the Swedish \nopposition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Sweden of today is a globalist<\/a>\n country. The establishment is comprised of globalists, from the media \n to the politicians. Sweden\u2019s constitutional laws have even been \nre-written to suit the globalists; for example, when it was enshrined in\n the constitution that Sweden would be a multicultural country and a \nmember of the EU. As such, the opposition is not represented by the \nModerates or Leftists, who instead can both be said to be the other side\n of the same coin as the Social Democrats and the rest of the parties \nin parliament. The opposition is instead the anti-globalists \u2014 i.e., \nthe nationalists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In this article I will examine some practical examples of how the \npeople\u2019s freedoms and rights are being increasingly restricted in \nSweden, against nationalists in general and against those who are \nengaged in the most radical nationalist alternative \u2014 the Nordic \nResistance Movement \u2014 in particular. These types of restrictions always \n begin with the most radical and refractory groups (and those with the \nmost growth potential), but they will hardly stop there. Only when the \nentire population thinks exactly as those who rule desire them to will \nthe restrictions cease. Only when every individual applauds the \nglobalist agenda and their own national destruction will the witch hunt \n be over.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You will not hear about any of this in the mainstream media, other \nthan in a strongly distorted form in which you as a consumer are \nencouraged to contribute to the death of freedom of expression and your \nnation. According to such editorials, opinion pieces, news items, radio \nreports, TV debate programmes and documentaries, it\u2019s only \u201cviolent \nterrorists\u201d who are subjected to repression. Of course, the number of \npeople classed as \u201cviolent terrorists\u201d and those affected by the \never-increasing banning craze will only grow larger and larger in time \nas the system becomes bolder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Basic Freedom of Speech Does Not Exist in Sweden!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
For example, did you know?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2022 What people are allowed to express is being increasingly \nrestricted. Not only that which clearly defies the regime and its \nrepresentatives is now punishable, but also that which biased \nprosecutors arbitrarily interpret as defiance.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
The legislation which falls under the classification of \u201cincitement \nto racial hatred\u201d in Sweden is not \u2014 as the establishment would have you\n believe \u2014 a law which primarily exists to protect ethnic, religious \nand sexual minorities from abuse. These minorities already possess full\n legal protection under laws pertaining to defamation and illegal \nthreats. In fact, via the hate crime amendment, these \u201cminorities\u201d enjoy\n a higher level of protection than we White heterosexual Swedes. It is \n also worth mentioning in this context that neither the hate crime \namendment nor incitement to racial hatred legislation is applied when non-Swedes discriminate against Swedes<\/a> on ethnically motivated grounds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Instead the incitement to racial hatred law primarily exists to \nprotect the regime from all forms of public criticism of their globalist\n world order. Representatives of the regime have even officially stated \nthat there isn\u2019t a need for a ban on \u201cracist\u201d groups in Sweden because the incitement to racial hatred law already exists<\/a>\n and fulfils the same purpose: \u201cAlthough the criminalisation focuses on \nthe actions [of an organisation], the purpose of the Swedish legislation\n is that such organisations\u2019 activities shall be prevented.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One example of the real purpose of the law is demonstrated by the \nfact that a clear majority of all prosecutions relating to incitement to\n racial hatred do not originate from police reports by individuals from\n various minority groups who felt offended or upset, but from \npro-system, taxpayer-supported political associations whose only \npurpose is to trawl the Internet for posts to mass report. Two culprits\n of such activities are Juridikfronten<\/a> <\/em>(The Legal Front), whose work attempts to restrict press freedom, and N\u00e4thatsgranskaren<\/a> <\/em>(Net Hate Inspectors), who hound pensioners who express themselves \u201cincorrectly\u201d online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Swedish Defence Research Agency (together with the police) has also launched a \u201chate-o-meter\u201d<\/a>,\n a piece of software designed to actively search the Internet for \ncomments that could be regarded as constituting incitement to racial \nhatred.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The intention of the law becomes even clearer when one considers the \n flexibility with which it can be interpreted. One thing that strongly \ndifferentiates Sweden\u2019s racial hatred legislation from the equivalent \nlaws abroad is that in other countries it is often very clear and \nstraightforward what is illegal to express and what is not. In Sweden, \nhowever, the law is always open for interpretation by the court, which \nleads to the unique and unjust situation in which people are judged in \nretrospect for things they believed were legal to express at the time. \nThis means you can go to prison without even knowing that you did \nsomething illegal, no matter how well versed you are in the law. For \nobvious reasons, this should not be the case in a legal state, and there\n is no other law in the country that is applied in this way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Increasingly, the Orwellian term \u201cinterpreted facts\u201d<\/a>\n is being used in Sweden, which in practice entails a judgement being \nbased not only on what is expressed but also on who expressed it, \nleading to inequality under the law. As such, symbols, expressions, \nwords and gestures are completely legal if, for example, a known Social \nDemocrat uses them, but illegal if a known nationalist says, does or \nwrites precisely the same thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2022 Troll factories attempting to influence elections are being \noperated openly by parliamentary parties and more covertly by \npro-system journalists and the media.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
More and more examples are continually being discovered of government\n parties, big media outlets and various state institutions actively \norganising people behind anonymous Internet accounts in order to combat \n dissident thinkers. One such case is the infamous apparatchik Dan \nEliasson\u2019s MSB (Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency), whose foremost task is to tackle so-called disinformation in society<\/a>\n \u2014 in other words, views that are controversial, oppositional and \ncritical of the system. In addition we have supposedly private \ninitiatives (with personnel and financiers who clearly connect them to \nthe current system) launching astroturf hashtag campaigns like \u201cjag\u00e4rh\u00e4r<\/em>\u201d<\/a> [I am here] or \u201cinterasistmen<\/em>\u201d [not racist but\u2026]. The Social Democrats have also quite openly admitted to running troll operations<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
The media are complicit here too. By openly and mendaciously \nreporting on troll factories and \u201cfake news\u201d by the opposition and \nattempting to make the system appear legitimate at all times, they \nthemselves do more trolling than the trolls they are supposed to be \nresponsible for exposing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2022 Symbols, including those representing millennia-old culture \u2014 \nand even greetings that are used by opponents of the system \u2014 are \ncontinually being banned. It is now even illegal to honour individual \npeople who historically stood up against the system.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
For many years, the millennia-old solar symbol of the swastika, or \nfylfot, has been completely banned in Sweden. It is also prohibited to \nwear certain death\u2019s-head symbols and some ancient Nordic runes and \nother cultural symbols in various combinations. Sweden\u2019s interior \nminister, Morgan Johansson, said in 2018 that a committee had been appointed to investigate banning the Tyr rune<\/a>,\n which, as well as being a letter in our forefathers\u2019 runic alphabet, \nis also the symbol of the Nordic Resistance Movement. If the ban goes \nthrough, it will pave the way for the prohibition of all Nordic runes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is sometimes argued that the swastika and runes, despite their \nhistorical significance, have now taken on another meaning which \nlegitimises a ban. Firstly, the belief that certain ideas should be \nforbidden from being manifested in symbols is a highly totalitarian \npoint of view \u2014 but, as with the aforementioned examples, it is also \nnoteworthy when considering where the boundaries are drawn and who has \nthe right to set them. Where does it end?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00d6rebro city court ruled in October 2018 that it is forbidden to display an image<\/a>\n of Adolf Hitler if the person responsible does not simultaneously \nrepudiate Hitler\u2019s life and actions. Here, just as in the case of the \nbanned symbols, you can think what you want about Hitler, but the fact \nthat someone is no longer allowed to publish photographs of people the \nestablishment disapproves of is a glaring example of just how far our \nanti-free speech laws have been extended. Who will be forbidden from \nbeing portrayed next remains to be seen\u2026 Why not the old Swedish prime \nministers P\u00e4r Albin Hansson and Tage Erlander, who clearly stood for a policy that, according to the system, would be regarded as very controversial today<\/a>?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2022 Organisations the establishment disapproves of are defamed by the state\u2019s public representatives and threatened with bans.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Almost every high-ranking politician or chief editor has on at least \n one occasion in recent years utilised the largest media outlets to urge\n for the curtailing of freedom of association and the banning of the Nordic Resistance Movement<\/a>.\n In all cases, smears, shameful epithets and barefaced lies are used to\n justify the ban of what is a fully legal and \u2014 according to all the \nrules \u2014 correctly registered political party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When the Center Party\u2019s leader Annie L\u00f6\u00f6f calls the Resistance \nMovement a \u201chate sect\u201d, and the prime minister himself, Stefan L\u00f6fven, \nlabels the party \u201cdisgusting\u201d and its members \u201cthe scum of history\u201d, one\n realises just how extreme the level of defamation is<\/a>.\n No logical reasoning or ideological arguments are ever used; instead \nit\u2019s almost like a competition to see who can agitate against us in the \n most obscene way \u2014 all from the most high-ranking members of the \nestablishment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
A large number of powerful lobby organisations also participate in \nthe agitation. One particularly vociferous example is the World Jewish \nCongress (WJC), the world\u2019s most powerful openly Jewish lobby \norganisation, which was the main culprit responsible for the incitement \nto racial hatred law coming to Sweden in the first place, in addition to\n being openly involved in the outbreak of World War II. The WJC employ outright lies in their agitation against the Resistance Movement<\/a> and often repeat in their rhetoric that the organisation would use terror and violence to achieve its goals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2022 The bank accounts of oppositional political parties and associations are shut down and they aren\u2019t allowed to open new ones.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
The various bank accounts the Nordic Resistance Movement had at its disposal and operated impeccably for many years were shut down by Nordea<\/a>\n two years ago. Shortly thereafter, the accounts of the majority of \nother nationalist groups and websites were also shut down by other banks\n in addition to Nordea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When the Nordic Resistance Movement registered as a political party \nto stand in elections, the party was denied an account by all registered\n banks in Sweden.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a country like Sweden, where the possibility of using cash is quickly disappearing, being refused the use of bank accounts is a serious restriction of one\u2019s rights<\/a>.\n In effect, this is a partial ban of an organisation, as it prevents (or\n in our case makes it extremely difficult for) sympathisers who want to \ncontribute financially to its operations, as well as making it harder \nfor organisations to conduct vital aspects of their activities by paying\n invoices for goods and services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The private banks\u2019 justification for this repression is that the \norganisations\u2019 activities violate the banks\u2019 ethical values. There is \nnever any mention of any economic impropriety such as money laundering; \n rather, it is totally motivated by ideology and political standpoints.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
This means that either private businesses in Sweden are allowed \u2014 \nwithout any central judicial control or rules of conduct \u2014 to decide \nwhich political parties, media outlets and associations can exist and \noperate on the same terms as all the others, or that the state issues \ndirectives to private businesses dictating how they must act. Whatever \nthe case, the message is that if you are not a globalist, you do not \nhave the same rights as those who want to destroy our nations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2022 Journalists are abused by police when they attempt to document what the state doesn\u2019t want reported.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
The police often blatantly use excessive force against nationalists in general and the Resistance Movement in particular<\/a>.\n When journalists from Nordfront \u2014 a registered newspaper with \npublishing rights \u2014 document this, it isn\u2019t unusual for them to be \nsubjected to violence as well. On a number of occasions, people with \nvideo cameras and media vests have been pepper-sprayed and beaten with \nbatons just because they filmed police attacks<\/a> on activists. Earlier this year in Nyk\u00f6ping, for example, a police dog was set on a journalist and inflicted serious bite wounds<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
It is also more the rule than the exception that the police break the\n law by confiscating legally source-protected material like cameras and \nhard disks from Nordfront\u2019s journalists. When combined with incitement \nto racial hatred laws, which hit oppositional newspapers hard, this \nmakes it all the more difficult to run a media operation that does what \nall media outlets should do: truly investigate the power-holders and \ntheir lackeys.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2022 The freedom to demonstrate \u2014 which was previously safeguarded \ndespite other restrictions on people\u2019s liberties \u2014 is now also under \nthreat. Prosecutors assert that dissidents should be allowed to \ndemonstrate in theory, but that they will be punished for other \nfictitious charges if they do so.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Resistance Movement do not receive permission to hold demonstrations with anywhere near the same preconditions<\/a>\n as other parties and political organisations \u2014 both in relation to the\n length and location of marching routes and the time before the \nconditions are typically severely reduced compared to those in the \noriginal permit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Permission is still being granted at the time of writing, and so far \n there hasn\u2019t been a case in Sweden in which an opposition party has \nbeen denied permission to demonstrate outright under all conditions. \nHowever, an upcoming trial in Gothenburg this autumn could result in the\n effective abolition of the freedom to demonstrate for dissidents if \nthe prosecutor and police leadership of the West Sweden Region get \ntheir way. According to them, just attending a demonstration organised \nby the Nordic Resistance Movement will be regarded as incitement to \nracial hatred because the participants are \u201ctaking part in a march whose overall impression makes people think of 1930s Germany\u201d<\/a>.\n If an organisation is allowed to demonstrate in theory, but the people\n who participate in the demonstration are then convicted for racial \nhatred, the system has clearly banned the organisation from \ndemonstrating in practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Even if the outcome of the trial leads to the demonstrators\u2019 \nacquittal, the whole case is still a very interesting example of how the\n establishment deals with these issues. Just bringing such a case to \ncourt (together with the media\u2019s headlines about being convicted for \ncrimes for taking part in the Resistance Movement\u2019s demonstrations) has \nhad a visibly negative effect on the number of participants at the \norganisation\u2019s events and has essentially paralysed sections of the \nnationalist demonstration culture<\/a> which had been built up over the years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2022 All large media outlets are pawns of the regime. As well as \nregularly publishing blatant lies about opposition politicians, they do\n not permit the broadcast of opinions not sanctioned by the government.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
All established TV and radio channels and major newspapers \u2014 private \n and state-owned, national and local, news services and entertainment \u2014 \n are operated according to a globalist agenda. No media is neutral. A majority of media owners aren\u2019t even Swedish<\/a>. In addition, nobody is ever held accountable for the lies and defamation directed at organisations or associations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
All of this combined means that \u2014 aside from reading and watching \nalternative media \u2014 you cannot access information that doesn\u2019t benefit \nglobalist interests and which all too often is permeated with untruths. \n Individuals who are active in the opposition are also regularly doxxed<\/a>, hounded and smeared purely because of their political engagement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a>
An example of a mainstream media doxxing article: \u201cExpressen investigates the Swedish Nazi women\u201d<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
News that doesn\u2019t fit the globalist narrative is omitted or distorted\n beyond recognition. All opinion pieces and reports convey a globalist \n image of the world, and every time the nationalist opposition conduct \nany kind of activity, it is met by either silence or denunciation. For \nexample, they always talk about<\/em> the Resistance Movement, never with<\/em>\n the Resistance Movement \u2014 or at least not without heavily editing and \n misrepresenting what is said. Even reader contributions and replies \nwhich are not to the liking of the new world order are consistently \ndenied publication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The media climate in Sweden is not just a narrow \u201copinion corridor\u201d \nbut an immense and total opinion vacuum. This is particularly serious \nbecause the media\u2019s power is without a shadow of a doubt greater than \nthat of the elected politicians. It is the media which actively \ninfluences and shapes the opinions of the people and makes them vote \n\u201ccorrectly\u201d in elections. In many cases, it is evidently the media that governs the politicians<\/a> and not the reverse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2022 International social media sites like Facebook, YouTube, \nInstagram and Twitter are closely involved in the repression and delete\n accounts and posts the state wants censored.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
The opposition\u2019s posts on social media are deleted, their official accounts and those of their representatives are shut down,<\/a>\n and those who still manage to \u201clike\u201d or share anything are exiled to \nthe periphery of the Internet. On Facebook and Instagram, all users who \n link to any of the Resistance Movement\u2019s websites are banned. On \nTwitter there is even a block filter<\/a>\n that stops links to some of the Movement\u2019s sites being posted at all. \n On YouTube, videos and accounts that don\u2019t serve the globalists\u2019 \ninterests are deleted on a daily basis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
All this happens with the consent and support of the state. Politicians have openly admitted that they have direct contact with Facebook via their own phone line<\/a>,\n which they can use to get anything they want censored and removed. The \nstate\u2019s representatives have also held meetings with companies like \nGoogle regarding censorship on YouTube<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In today\u2019s society, it\u2019s increasingly important to be on social \nmedia. More and more organisations and businesses don\u2019t even have \nwebsites anymore but manage all their web presence via these Internet \ngiants. Many people don\u2019t interact with others in the same way as before\n and get nearly all their social contact via social media. In other \nwords, being completely silenced in this arena is an effective way for \nthe system to stop the opposition being seen or heard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is Your Duty to Act!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
All of the above instances really only scratch the surface of the \nsystem\u2019s attempts to silence citizens, media and organisations with the \n \u201cwrong\u201d opinions. Further examples include how those engaged with the \nopposition \u2014 completely or partly with the system\u2019s help \u2014 lose their \njobs, hunting weapons, membership in trade unions and residents\u2019 \nassociations, and how they are harassed with daily \u201croutine checks\u201d, or \n for that matter by groundless investigations by the Swedish Tax Agency<\/a>\n because of so-called \u201creverse burden of proof\u201d rules. Then there are \nthe occasions when S\u00c4PO (the Swedish Security Service) contact community\n centres to prevent the hiring of local premises, or when \nmunicipalities buy up old buildings for excessive prices to stop the \nResistance Movement from purchasing them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Opponents\u2019 liberties are restricted more with every day that passes. \n Swedish freedom of opinion is dying out. Today it mostly affects the \nNordic Resistance Movement and closely related groups, but if one \nobserves how the system actively works to push the boundaries on issues \n such as incitement to racial hatred legislation \u2014 or how they cooperate\n with private entities like the social media giants and the banks, who \nin practice are not being limited by any constitutional laws \u2014 then one\n understands it is very obvious that it will come to affect more and \nmore people and organisations, until we eventually live in a \ndictatorship wherein only the most pro-system globalists are not \nsubject to its repression.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So is this article just a series of complaints? Am I playing the world\u2019s biggest victim card?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No, this is purely a presentation of information. These are facts \nthat will hopefully rouse you as a reader and incite you to act. If not \n for something more distant like your people\u2019s future survival, then at \n least for freedom of speech \u2014 your<\/em> freedom of speech \u2014 which is disappearing here and now, right in front of you!<\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Those of us who have been actively engaged in the Nordic Resistance \nMovement for many years are hardly surprised by what\u2019s happening. We \nhave long understood that their \u201cdemocracy\u201d is just a veiled \ndictatorship and that we are only allowed to have our freedoms and \nrights as long as we don\u2019t use them against the globalists and win the \npeople to our side. We saw through their \u201cfreedom\u201d fa\u00e7ade back in 1945 \nwhen Hiroshima and Nagasaki were atom-bombed, and when hundreds of \nthousands of German women were raped during the occupation. We saw \nthrough it in recent decades when multiculturalism\u2019s uncountable numbers\n of victims were brushed aside and mocked (according to the \nestablishment, those who dare to report ethnically motivated assaults, \nmuggings and rapes are not victims but racists who must be fought and \nsilenced). And we see through it today when they duplicitously praise \ntheir so-called democracy, diversity and freedom of thought on the one \nhand, while seeking to crush all forms of public rule, biological \ndiversity and oppositional freedom of speech on the other.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
So is everything in this article just hypocrisy? Won\u2019t the Nordic Resistance Movement ban all other views when we take power?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No. In a National Socialist society, the people\u2019s liberties and rights are sacrosanct. Freedom of speech will be extended compared to today<\/a>,\n and there will be considerably more policy-making referenda on a \nvariety of issues. Meanwhile, an authoritarian state makes it possible \nto take decisions in more acute matters without bureaucratic \ncomplications and parliamentary bickering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The truth is that the system projects its own thoughts and views onto\n us \u2014 its sworn enemies. When they accuse us of wanting to destroy \nfreedom of speech, it\u2019s because they themselves desire the silencing of \n the people. When they describe us as hateful, it\u2019s because they are \ndriven by a pronounced hatred of the planet and the people of the world.\n When they call us violent terrorists, it\u2019s to hide the fact that they \n are responsible for the majority of all the violence and terror in the \n world today. Not only are their claims about us false, but they are \nalso hypocritical on an unparalleled scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
$\"\"$ <\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
Now that you have read these words and understand what is happening, it is time for you to act. Do whatever you think is best \u2014 support the Nordic Resistance Movement<\/a>\n if you believe that is right \u2014 do something else if you believe in \nthat. The important thing is that you do something and don\u2019t just \ncontinue to sit still while the system takes away everything you have. \nDo not give away your rights without a fight. Do not give away your \npeople\u2019s future without a struggle. Don\u2019t let them take away your life \nwithout resistance!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Sweden: Anti-White Totalitarianism and the Death of Free Speech Chris Rossetti \u00b7 19 January, 2020 4 by Simon Lindberg The Nordic people\u2019s constitutional freedoms and rights are being abolished. Repression against critics of the system is increasing. The situation is … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3701"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3701"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3701\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3811,"href":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3701\/revisions\/3811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3701"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3701"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3701"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Notice: ob_end_flush(): Failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/public/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5373