{"id":10333,"date":"2025-01-17T00:20:29","date_gmt":"2025-01-17T05:20:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/?p=10333"},"modified":"2025-01-17T00:20:29","modified_gmt":"2025-01-17T05:20:29","slug":"np-view-the-age-of-trudeaus-censorship-schemes-is-over","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cafe.nfshost.com\/?p=10333","title":{"rendered":"NP View: The age of Trudeau’s censorship schemes is over"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

NP View: The age of Trudeau’s censorship schemes is over<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

The campaign to place the internet under government control died when he prorogued Parliament<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Author of the article:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(National Post View<\/a> Published Jan 11, 2025)\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

653 Comments<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Image
Photo by Getty Images\/iStockphoto<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Article content<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

By proroguing Parliament on Monday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau snuffed the life out of one of his favourite darlings: Bill C-63, also known as the online harms act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There\u2019s no excuse for suspending democracy at a time like this, but we should at least celebrate the death of this atrocious bill. Had it (or the two bills the Liberals were to replace it with<\/a>) passed, the Canadian Human Rights Commission would have been made sheriff of the Canadian internet, empowering it to drag anyone through a lengthy tribunal process making online comments perceived to be hateful. What\u2019s worse, anyone reporting mean comments to this tribunal would be allowed to remain anonymous, which would have allowed the process to be weaponized with ease.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bill would have also added \u201chate crime\u201d to the Criminal Code, with a maximum penalty of life in prison \u2014 which is little consolation when the line between mean comments and criminal hatred was left dangerously vague. Further, it would have forced social media giants under the boot of a new digital safety bureaucracy, expanding government once more while creating more costs for outside firms operating in Canada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Its death marks the end of an era in Canada. There will be no more internet-tampering legislation from the Liberals. This. Is. It. Stamp this in your calendar as the time when online freedom began its comeback.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most of this story hasn\u2019t been a positive one. During its mid-life crisis years, the government grasped what authority it could over online media. And \u2014 to the horror of Canadians \u2014 it gained a considerable amount of ground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After a long campaign that started in 2020<\/a>, a beachhead for online interference was established with the 2023 passing of Bill C-11<\/a>, the Online Streaming Act, which placed digital streamers under the ambit of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The act gave the CRTC the government\u2019s blessing to impose Canadian content requirements on streaming giants, as well as some form of diversity requirements<\/a> \u2014 similar to the ones imposed<\/a> upon the CBC not too long ago. It also permitted the CRTC to take a cut of their Canadian revenues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite the many objections they faced, the Liberals fast-tracked<\/a> the bill through Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, not only is the government preparing to tell streaming companies what to produce and how to spend their budgets, it\u2019s also making these services more expensive. (The fate of the CRTC\u2019s house rake is currently in legal limbo<\/a> as the streamers are currently challenging them in the courts, but some subscription prices have already been raised to account for these costs).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Liberals wanted more control. They put millions of dollars into the dystopically named Changing Narratives Fund<\/a>, to ensure that more media featuring favoured groups would be available to Canadian viewers. Even more millions were funnelled into a grab-bag of projects<\/a> that claimed to combat disinformation and hate online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To finally top it off, the government made its move to become censor-in-chief last February by tabling<\/a> C-63 \u2014 and failed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The culture is moving on, so it\u2019s unlikely these efforts will be revived anytime soon. Just look at the private sector. The censorship-for-your-own-good schtick got old fast during the COVID pandemic, which saw the reach of social media accounts criticizing lockdowns<\/a> mysteriously sink, and the banning of many users who had the gall to question a COVID vaccine\u2019s ability to prevent infection. When it turned out lockdowns and vaccine efficacy weren\u2019t as solid as once thought, outrage ensued.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That\u2019s how it went with any contentious issue in those days: unflattering news about President Joe Biden\u2019s son was suppressed<\/a>; those who didn\u2019t believe in transgender identity could have their accounts frozen<\/a> or even banned<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By 2022, Elon Musk went as far as buying Twitter<\/a>, promising an end to the ridiculous censorship \u2014 and now, in 2025, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is following in his steps<\/a>. The consensus in Silicon Valley is shifting against telling people what to think, and it\u2019s about time. The United States government isn\u2019t likely to interfere, either \u2014 though the Biden administration eagerly had state agents<\/a> commandeer the back end of social media giants, president-elect Trump is more interested in reducing the number of state agents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Canada isn\u2019t far behind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The future of the internet is one of comments, both mean and nice. It will require adults to be the masters of their online experiences, without the bubble wrap of government and social media authorities, but that\u2019s a burden we\u2019re willing to shoulder. We don\u2019t need more government messing around with our feeds, getting human rights tribunals to decide which comments go too far. We need them to buzz off entirely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At last, the Liberal government is now in palliative care, closely following C-63 to the grave. With any hope, a new government will torch C-11 and the ant colony of online-harms grants geared at inventing problems where there are none.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The zeitgeist is long past Trudeau Liberal-style suppression. Silencing one\u2019s opponents by crying hate just isn\u2019t going to work anymore. It\u2019s over, censorship advocates. The age of free expression is here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

National Post<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Follow us<\/p>\n\n\n\n