The Great Censorship Purge Begins, Starting With holocaust Skeptics


The Great Censorship Purge Begins, Starting With holocaust Skeptics



want to inform you about the
with the HOAX DENIERS as
primary targets.

We who refute and deny the hollyweird version of the hoax are like the plug in a drain.  They target and remove us – ALL THE REST OF THE ISSUES GO TOO.  It’s like Diane‘s SAME SOUP ILLUSTRATION.  Just the Beginning.
I predicted this way back when, and it will soon be followed by other topics, like gays,women,abortion, whatever other the PC police will allow. Welcome to 1984!

The JEWS of the ADL and SPLC just BANNED Brother Nathanael from YouTube.
Every single one of my over 500 Videos there is GONE.  Jews are our misfortune.
“I will be posting on BitChute and my own Brother Nathanael Channel from now on.” +Brother Nathanael

The Recent YouTube Censorship S*** – Storm. 🙁
YouTube’s Censorship Policy Announcement

“NAZI’s” haven’t existed since 1945. What an “anti-intellectual” moron’s ad hominem false argument / statement.

IF  it’s such a stupid theory” (fact?), why is YouTube so threatened by Sandy Hoax proponents? Just sayn. 

Jim Fetzer’s Channel was part of YouTube’s recent communistic America-hating free-speech carnage.

If you like deciding things for yourself, here’s at least one Jim Fetzer back-up channel 4U:

IF  you like YouTube deciding for you, please ignore all these Jim Fetzer links. They know better. 

One of my favorite Fetzer presentations was his “False Flags on Five Fronts” presentation. WOW!

🔴 LIVE – The YouTube Censorship S*** – Storm

YouTube’s Scorched Earth Tactics & Vox Media Union Strike




WACA-TV, A Pathetic Massachusetts Cable Company Enforces Zionist History & Bans Diane King’s “Connect the Dots” Show

WACA-TV, A Pathetic Massachusetts Cable Company Enforces Zionist History & Bans Diane King’s “Connect the Dots” Show


After 3 years of association in good standing with WACA-TV, Ashland, MA, my programming was summarily SUSPENDED. Below, find the letter the attorney of the station sent to me and my response.  I invite you to express your outrage as you see fit. Diane King

May 20, 2019

David M. Click
DMC Law Offices
100 Waverly St, Suite 1
Ashland, MA 01721

Mr. Click:

As I am traveling and since you did NOT send this to me in EMAIL (though you declared you had), but via Federal Express (and not even to be signed for), I have had to have your letter sent to me in ‘picture’ mode through email.  Thus your appalling letter below and I will address 5 points.

1)  On April 1, 2016, I petitioned Ms. Chisolm for a time slot for my cable show, now named CONNECT THE DOTS.  Because of it’s controversial nature, she moved and maintained my show to/at midnight, AKA SAFE HARBOR.   Over my 3+ years’ association with Ms. Chisolm, she knew the shows were extremely controversial, that I featured the internationally renowned Jim and Joe Rizoli and a number of other politically INCORRECT personalities and topics, including myself, and it wasn’t an issue with her because … I WAS SLOTTED IN SAFE HARBOR.  This was to protect my right to express my opinions about politics, our wretched government, the lying WWII history we are force fed and yes, even the holocaust fraud and/or whatever else is going on in our pathetic world.

2)  During this process to attempt to gain a time slot, which took 8 months (first airing Jan 1, 2017), I requested on more than one occasion a copy of WACA-TV POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL (and still would like to see it). She said there was none.  It was obvious, she made all the decisions and didn’t need a manual to do that.  (So your citing the now existent but then NONexistent manual is disingenuous AND THUS pointless – I had neither been given nor offered the NONEXISTENT manual.)

3)  And since you mentioned the FCC, I would like to direct your attention to this paragraph on their site.   In regard to WACA-TVs censorship, they are out of order, wrong and in violation of FCC practices:

The FCC and Freedom of Speech, Mar 8, 2019 – guide:  What is the FCC’s Responsibility? The FCC is barred by law from trying to prevent the broadcast of any point of view. The Communications Act prohibits the FCC from censoring broadcast material, in most cases, and from making any regulation that would interfere with freedom of speech. Expressions of views that do not involve a “clear and present danger of serious, substantive evil” come under the protection of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of the press and prevents suppression of these expressions by the FCC. According to an FCC opinion on this subject, “the public interest is best served by permitting free expression of views.” This principle ensures that the most diverse and opposing opinions will be expressed, even though some may be highly offensive.

4)  Your reference to the rampant, out-of-control censorship mindset of social media against Jim Rizoli, for example on YouTube, as your excuse to censor me is unconscionable.   It is especially so for WACA-TV since recently, they featured a program promoting “free speech.”  Because of my experience with them, I conclude that it is only lip service, no matter how many functionally constitutionally illiterate guests they have pretending to support free speech … well, free speech for some, not me and evidently not free speech for black conservatives featured on my May RACIALLY AWARE program, the last show aired on my CONNECT THE DOTS program on WACA-TV.)   WACA-TV, cable TV and ALL internet social media constitute the MODERN PUBLIC SQUARE no matter how much you wish to disassociate yourselves as a ‘corporation’.  It is PUBLIC broadcasting and thus, are responsible to protect the rights – freedom of expression – to ALL THE PUBLIC.

5)  If there actually is a manual (unable to locate on the obscure WACA-TV website), I venture to say there would be a protocol for dealing with ‘unpleasant’ thought and expression and that would NOT include summarily suspending/censoring a member with 3 years of association/good standing.

I vehemently protest WACA (and by association) your sanctions and prohibition of the expression of my free speech with weak and pitiful legal references. Their and your behaviors support the ANTI-FREEDOM communist mindset growing and controlling New England. This is not the LAND OF THE FREE because it is NOT the home of the freedom-loving (and protecting) brave.  (Oh, and by the way, perhaps you could send your letter to my email as well this time.)

Diane King
94 Pond St
Framingham, MA 01702

cc:  Board of Directors, WACA-TV

Barbara Chisholm
200 Butterfield Dr.
Ashland, MA 01721

(508) 881-9222

Dr. James Sears & the Sentencing Drama: YOUR WARD NEWS is a Safety Valve that Heads Off Violence

Dr. James Sears & the Sentencing Drama: YOUR WARD NEWS is  a Safety Valve that Heads Off Violence
Videographers Jim Rizoli and Diane King  were in Toronto and Hamilton speaking for the Canadian Association for Free Expression, and Dr. James Sears was asked to
say a few words. Please spread this video far and wide. I We want EVERYONE to know that “evil Nazi holocaust revisionists” spoke to a large group of free speech supporters in

Toronto, and a convicted hatemonger opened for them. And CAFE was proud to present this courageous free speech Christian saint, Dr. Sears, to open the meeting

The Concerned Citizens and Friends of Illegal Immigration Law Enforcement or CCFIILE was listed by the SPLC as a general hate group

Framingham Group Listed As Hate Group By SPLC

A Framingham based group was listed among 14 hate groups in Massachusetts by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a watchdog group that tracks hate groups across the nation.

The Concerned Citizens and Friends of Illegal Immigration Law Enforcement, or CCFILE, was founded in 2003 by twin brothers Jim and Joe Rizoli. It has been listed as a “general hate” group since 2009 by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Jim Rizoli did not flatly reject the SPLC‘s categorization but instead asked, “What constitutes a hate group?” He added that he consider’s the SPLC a hate group.

The SPLC defines a hate group as “an organization that – based on its official statements or principles, the statements of its leaders, or its activities – has beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.”

CCFIILE’s presence and categorization by the SPLC is not new to Framingham. The mayor’s office is aware of the listing but refused to comment on it, saying the group should not get any more attention that it deserves.

The group focuses on illegal immigration. Several posts on its website target immigrants in Framingham’s Brazilian community, decry censorship and deny the Holocaust. The group’s website does not list any meetings, but Rizoli said it has a large following on the internet. The website homepage includes tabs that read “Case Against the Jews,” “Rizolis Uncensored” and “Conspiracies.”

Jim Rizoli could not give a hard count to how many members are part of the group. “It’s hard to say,” Rizoli said, “It’s a belief system in your mind, how you think and act.”

The Rizolis once had a cable TV show but it was canceled by Access Framingham in 2011 for violating network policies after a viewer complained about anti-Semitic content.

The most recent public appearance by either brother was by Joe Rizoli during a City Council meeting called to discuss a proposed welcoming ordinance directed at the immigrant community. Rizoli was the only member of the public to speak against the proposal, claiming it would be a gateway for illegal immigration.

Cesar Stewart-Morales, a commissioner on Framingham’s Human Relations Commission said he initially didn’t know much about CCFIILE and what the group stood for. He said knew the beliefs the Rizolis hold and that it didn’t surprise him that they are on the SPLC‘s list again. “Everything he says is just so offensive,” Morales said.

The commission has not heard any formal complaints against the group, but Morales said given the reaction to the welcoming ordinance by Joe Rizoli at the City Council meeting and the SPLC‘s news, the commission will discuss it. “Our job is to focus on how groups in the community are relating,” Morales said, “It will definitely be a discussion item.”

View the Souther Poverty Law Center’s full Hate Map.


Framingham To Hold Forum On Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Framingham PD Hopes to ‘Reflect the Community It Serves’

Letters Of Unity Pour In For Muslim Girl Targeted By Hate Speech

(For more news and information like this, subscribe to the Framingham Patch for free. If you have an iPhone, click here to get the free Patch iPhone app; download the free Patch Android app here. Don’t forget to like us on Facebook! Got a news tip? Email

Standing Up for Monika Schaefer — People Rally to Her Cause

Standing Up for Monika Schaefer — People Rally to Her Cause

On Saturday, February 2. CAFE posted Monika Schaefer’s account of the way she’d been humiliated and denied photocopying services  by Sonja Dickey owner of the 3 Sheets Stationary Store & Laundromat in Jasper, Alberta. Miss Dickey refused to do some photocopying because Monika was a “hateful” person.

It is heartening so see the torrent of support from Britain, Europe and across North America admonishing the small town snowflake Dickey and backing Monika.

Well done, free speech supporters.

Here’s just a sample of the e-mails sent thus far.

Paul Fromm




Canadian Association for Free Expression

Box 332,

Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3

Ph: 905-289-674-4455; FAX: 289-674-4820;


Paul Fromm, B.Ed, M.A. Director

February  2, 2019

Sonja Dickey
P.O. Box 2098,

Jasper, AB,

T0E 1E0

Dear Miss Dickey:

I read on the Internet about a recent incident in your store where you refused to provide service — running off photocopies —  to local musician Monika Schaefer because you believe she’s a “hateful” person.

You are in the business of serving the public, not running a private club. You are obligated to serve anyone who behaves and can pay her bill. Your treatment of Miss Schaefer may well be a violation not only of her rights but of provincial statute. I have asked our in- house counsel to review the law so that we might advise Miss Schaefer further.

I do a nightly radio show entitled “The Fighting Side of Me”. I invite you to be a guest on my show to explain your actions. I heard Miss Schaefer speak recently in Toronto, as part of a cross-Canada tour. Her treatment at the hands of some people in Jasper — shunning, banned from the Legion, subject of a smear campaign to ruin her violin lesson business — was disgusting. Jasper sounds, at times, like a bigoted, judgemental small town right out of some old movie.

I hope you’ll reconsider your treatment of her and consider coming on my show. We can hook up by Skype.

Sincerely yours,

Paul Fromm



Dear Ms. Dickey,

Along with Monika Schaefer I would like to know what you meant when you said you did not want to serve someone ‘who hates’.


According to the Merriam – Webster dictionary the definition of the verb ‘to hate’ is:

1to feel extreme enmity toward

2to have a strong aversion to


Do you think ‘hate’ should be quantified on a scale of, say, 0 to 100 according to which 0 means no hate, that is, no dislike or aversion and 100 means complete hate, that is, total and complete dislike or aversion?

In my view, on such a scale Monika’s forthright regard and search for historical truth along with her honorable exercise of the valuable principle of Freedom of Speech merit her an award of 0 on that scale.

What level of hate would you assign to Monika, and for what?

Because of the unprincipled way you treated Monika, I would award you a value of 70 or 75 on that scale.

Now that you know that I feel some dislike of, and disrespect for, what you have done, do you now hate me?  If so, at what level?


Rudy List, Ph.D. (Mathematics)

P.S.  If I come to Jasper, would you be willing to discuss this with me?

Dear Sonja,
Recently, you refused service to a brave Monika Schaefer. You need to know that Monika does not hate anyone, as you fervently believe, but stood up for the right to disagree on something – that is not hate – it is our right to debate – to disagree – to challenge – any and all ideas – in Canada so far – to scare people like yourself to keep quiet. You are fearful and obedient to the idea that someone who simply states that she does not believe the official story about something must be run out of town and destroyed – this is the despicable act you and your friends have done – shame on you.
You seem to not understand that your very business depends on free speech – the right to print free ideas. Try that in old Soviet Union, or North Korea or Cuba – you will go to jail for expressing free speech – you could not run your little printing business there – did you know that? Canada is so far not there but you need to understand that Monika stood up for you and me and 35 million Canadians to protect that right. So you can run a business that operates on the principle of free speech that people like Monika Schaefer are willing to fight for on your behalf – and for that you stab her in the back?
The obvious subject is Holocaust gas chambers which has been proven wrong by scientists and engineers – most people, myself included, and many politicians, scientists, academics, lay people, see the Holocaust as a big lie – these were work camps – nothing more – there was and is not any evidence of anything sinister happening there. All Monika did was express her belief that the Holocaust never happened – that is not hate – that is simply a belief and our Canadian right to do so.
Unfortunately you have been drawn into the fear of speaking for yourself and maybe thinking for yourself. Speaking about any subject is not hate speech. It is about questioning the official story. I know for a fact that Monika Schaefer does not “hate” as you put it – she simply reserves the right to express her opinion which I wholly agree with as do millions of others.
By disallowing Monika to use your services you are making a strong statement that you agree that free speech must be killed and stifled if someone does not like your point of view. Well, that is a dangerous thing – I may not agree with you, for example, but I don’t prevent you from running your business or conducting your life. We discuss. We disagree. But we walk away agreeing we disagree – but we do not chastise or disenfranchise each other. Jasper has bullied Monika shamefully. I hope you are proud.
Because Monika stood up for her convictions she was imprisoned in Germany. She was brave and she stood up for principles of free speech, the most fundamental right humans have in a free society. Jasper should be ashamed for victimizing a wonderful productive peaceful soul. In Medieval times people like you watched accused people tied up and burned at the stake and I’m sure you would have been right there watching, cheering and happy at someone being killed for some idea that others disagreed with – is that the world you want? I do hope you have a deep serious think on your actions. I hope you and your fellow Jasperians have a reflection on how you treated a fellow citizen for simply standing up for basic Canadian rights.
Maybe one day you will actually get some guts and conviction and realize that the free speech Monika stands up for is more than you and your many fellow Jasperians have done except condemn someone for protecting what you don’t even know you have. I am sad for you and your friends – you have lots to think about.
Al Majauskas

Dear Ms. Dickey:
It has come to my attention that you have a customer who is a friend of mine: namely, Monika Schaefer who lives in your beautiful town of Jasper.
Monika reports that you recently asked her to leave your store because you believed she was a “hateful” person.  This seems very curious to me.  A very odd and inexplicable story.
I know that there are always two sides to everything, and I would like to hear yours.
I am a native Texan who lives in New Orleans, Louisiana, but I have lived all over and was once offered a job at the University of Calgary and then another at the Royal Tyrrell (I didn’t take either of them because I was afraid of the winters—but that was before global warming really set in, I guess…).  Anyhow, I love the Canadian Rockies and the province of Alberta and have had great friends up there throughout my life, Banff, Calgary, Edmonton, Drumheller, Fort Macleod, Lake Louise…. so I don’t feel I am a total stranger to the setting… I think Canada is a lovely place and I have always had very special affection for the Canadian people…..
I am writing as a great fan of Monika Schaefer to ask whether you would like to appear on my extremely informal podcast talk show, either with Monika or alone, and explain to her, to my audience, and the world, why you think Monika Schaefer or her work embodies or represents any kind of hatred?
I suppose we are all (all of Monika’s friends and admirers) wondering why you would see fit to exclude a civil rights heroine from your store, to refuse to do business with her.
Won’t you explain, please?  To me privately if not to the world.
I happen to find Monika to be one of the kindest and gentlest, sincerest and truest people I know on earth.  To me, Monika Schaefer and her brother Alfred stand for LOVE and TRUTH above all.  If you disagree, I would like you to tell me, and the world, why.
If you think that the world is an exceedingly simple place, of black and white, I’d like to know how you can possibly put Monika Schaefer in among the forces of darkness.
My invitation is quite real and sincere and my podcast (based in New Orleans) is very informal.  You would not be embarrassed or “trapped” by any of my questions, but I think if you believe sincerely that Monika Schaefer is wrong about something—you should tell her “to her face” in a public forum…..

I hope that you will consider accepting my invitation to speak about why certain people should not be allowed in your store….. why you think their money would “taint” you or your equipment…..
I absolutely believe in freedom of association, and I certainly respect every person’s right to have opinions and even prejudices, but if these opinions are based on a perception different from mine, I am always very interested in hearing it.
To my mind, Monika Schaefer is just a superior person in every way.  But we should never be trapped inside our own worlds, unable to see through other people’s eyes.
Won’t you please explain to me why you would treat this lovely lady so badly as to order her out of your store?
I really want to hear YOUR side of this story… and I think a lot of other people would also…

Charles Edward Lincoln, III

“Ich bin der Geist der stets verneint, und das mit recht, 
denn alles was entsteht, Ist werth daß es zu Grunde geht.”
Deo Vindice/Tierra Limpia

Telephone: 504-777-5021 

This is what I emailed:  (Joe Rizoli)

I just read this incident that you had with Monika Schaefer and I really have to say this, how could you hate somebody so much to refuse their business? Its incomprehensible that people can act like this in this day and age.

If Monika was gay, black, an immigrant, Jewish or anything else this would be front page news.

Monica is a wonderful person and for you to treat her in this way is really disappointing to me…or better yet, shameful…

Joe Rizoli
Framingham, Massachusetts USA


(My email, Diane King)
Dear Ms. Sonja Dickey:

I just learned about what happened to my dear friend, Monika, in her attempt to acquire services at your copy business. I’ve visited Canada for years and am continually astounded at the increasing restrictions and soviet-style prohibitions imposed on regular Canadians for what? AND what did she do to you? I can only conclude that you must have received word from the higher-up soviet-style elite to tell you what to do or like she said, that you ARE afraid of consequences to doing normal business with her.

I do understand the concern about retribution (though I doubt you fully understand other than what someone MIGHT have told you about her), but I don’t accept the ‘ caving’ into their thugocracy.

We of those who cherish freedoms are appalled at your behavior and truly, you SHOULD be ashamed. You owe her an apology at the very least and some free service for her trouble. You can fix this.


Diane King
Nacogdoches, TX, USA

Dear Sonja,

I hope this email finds you inundated with comments regarding your refusal to serve Truth Warrior, Monika Schaefer based on spurious allegations flung at her by a certain international group of trouble makers who have a significant nest in Jasper.  Refusing someone a service which you advertise you will perform for recompense based on lies, innuendos, and ignorance is not a very good way to conduct business.  Especially not in a nation where free speech is still valued; albeit seriously under attack by the entity you no doubt are aware of and who likely contacted you and scared the bejeebies out of you.  In my opinion, you are a coward and stand contrary to the Canadian Bill of Rights.  If you are a Canadian citizen, you should be ashamed of yourself.

Sincerely, Gertjan Zwiggelaar, B.A., B.Ed. &c.

(Richard Edmonds)
Dear Ms. Dickey,

I write to you as a Briton who as a young man lived in Canada. In the 1960s I lived in the province of Ontario and worked in the smelter of a nickel-mining company at Falkenbridge, Sudbury.

I learn that you have refused to serve in your store a woman whom I have got to know, Monika Schaefer. As you might know Monika Schaefer was recently released from a jail in Germany where she had been incarcerated for eleven months for the “crime” of expressing her non-violent opinions. All shame on the German judicial authorities that their law-books make Free Speech a criminal offence. Thank goodness that we Britons and including Canadians, of course, enjoy Free Speech in our lands.

All that said, I cannot understand your refusing to serve Monika Schaefer and your talk of “hatred”. Monika Schaefer, a music teacher and resident of your town of Jasper, is a pleasant, mild mannered middle-aged woman who takes a lively open-minded interest in the world. Surely we can all rub along and leave talk of “hatred” behind us ?

Yours sincerely, Richard Edmonds


Dear Ms. Dickey,

Well said, Mr. Richard Edmonds!

Good grief, your ill-treatment of dear Monika, a sweeter person of non-hatefilled disposition one could ever hope to meet!   
A shop-keeper who cannot allow herself to recognise her own personal experience of Monika’s firm but sweet nature – a personal experience which should over-ride that shop-keeper’s evidently media-emboldened, hate-indoctrinating prejudice.

Talk about turn-speak!
Bravo Monika Schaefer for standing your ground as always with role-model courteous dignity; shame on any media-gullible, hate-compliant shop-keeper.
Yours truly,  Lady M. Renouf


Subject: to Sonja Dickey in Jasper, Alberta: regarding your treatment of Monika Schaefer
To: <>

Hello Sonja,

As a defender of free speech I’m dismayed at the way you treated Monika Schaefer. Please consider that when it comes to being turned into an outcast for speaking your mind she is historically in good company. You can go back into early Greek society where you find the philosopher Socrates who had to drink poison because his opinion did not agree with that prevailing among the people of Athens. Others that come to mind are Galileo and Martin Luther. A Czech religious leader, Jan Huss, was burned at the stake for proposing a change in the creed of his time – and there are many more.


Why are you giving support to what we call the “Politically Correct”? That is the tyranny of the ruling oligarchy that has produced one war after the other. Why are so many people acting like

brainless sheep? In the end they will all be led to the slaughter. Why don’t people start to think on their own rather than relying on the opinion of others? All it requires is to inform oneself beyond the

mass media and read some books that certain people try to suppress? Of course, Sonja, it is much more convenient to follow the herd than to do your own research. What else can I say? I feel sorry for you for having been brainwashed.


Chris Klein, President,

Coalition of Victims and Survivors of World War II




JOHN FITZGERALD:  A Republican congressional candidate in a reliably blue California district managed to capture nearly a quarter of votes cast in the state’s open primary last month — just after the state Republican Party caught wind of his anti-Semitic comments and rescinded its automatic endorsement.  The candidate, John Fitzgerald, urged people on his campaign website to pay attention to “Jewish supremacism,” among other anti-Semitic views, which led party leaders to rescind their support in May, about two months after the official endorsement.  In the weeks since, Mr. Fitzgerald has increased the frequency of his anti-Semitic statements and has appeared on podcasts in which he claimed the Holocaust was a fabrication.  “Everything we’ve been told about the Holocaust is a lie,” Mr. Fitzgerald said last week on a radio show hosted by Andrew Carrington Hitchcock, an anti-Semitic commentator who has glorified Hitler. (NY Times)



Just in from the “Land of the (once) free and the Home of the Brave” Holocaust Skeptic Diane King’s Vimeo Accounts Cancelled



Just in from the “Land of the (once) free and the Home of the Brave” Holocaust Skeptic Diane King’s Vimeo Accounts Cancelled



To ensure delivery, add to your address book.


Dear Diane King,

Your account has been removed by the Vimeo Staff for violating our Guidelines.

Reason: Vimeo does not allow videos that harass, incite hatred, or include discriminatory or defamatory speech.

For more information on our content and community policies, please visit:

If you believe this was an error, please reply to this message as soon as possible to explain. (Please be aware that Vimeo moderators take action as violations come to our attention. “I see other people doing it” is not a valid explanation.)

Otherwise, we hope that you find a video platform better suited to your needs.

Vimeo Staff

TM + © 2018 Vimeo, Inc.
555 West 18th Street, New York, NY 10011
Terms | Privacy Policy


A number of friends of mine have recently simultaneously had their VIMEO accounts removed. As we watched YouTube remove channels of the people who are Politically Incorrect, (not just people like myself who discuss the World War II issues, but all kinds of issues largely to the right of the political spectrum, we have watched them be targeted and marginalized. Now because this was not occurring with VIMEO at that point, we thought that VIMEO was taking the high road in regard to political correctness, fully supporting the FREEDOM OF SPEECH mandate in our Bill of Rights. In fact, I even boasted that VIMEO was seemingly championing free speech – we were cautiously optimistic … BUT WRONG!!!

My friend and I had a PRO account, which entails spending between $200 and $250 for the year. We thought that as a result of that we might be given additional or even special consideration, like being sent a warning. But that was not the case.  It appears that VIMEO received the PC word to ‘ax’ holocaust skeptic discussions without consideration.  This was done very swiftly, so apparently, VIMEO doesn’t feel our business is worth their time.  And you likely are being compensated for your betrayal and treachery – why ‘dis’ a 3-year customer who is spending the money for the PRO account! I hope it’s worth it to have received your 30 pieces of silver, selling your soul to your masters instead of doing the right thing!

Well here’s the thing about that, frankly, we don’t feel VIMEO is worth OUR time. You stole the money from us that we paid to you in good faith for the service you had provided. You terminated our channels. (Yes I know your policies excuse you from refunding us. That still doesn’t make it right.)  It seems you are permitted (for any reason) to terminate the business relationship for your ill-gotten gains!  You obviously don’t care about your reputation in the social media community – business must be THAT good. Maybe you’re being compensated to betray your patrons in the Soviet-style draconian method of dealing with free speech.

But, actually, you have done us a huge favor. Rather than depending on perhaps what used to be the major social media outlets such as Facebook, YouTube and VIMEO yourself, where we were formally supportive and would throw business your way, we no longer have to. We are fully prepared to explain and express what VIMEO has done to us in the same way we have talked about YouTube. We will warn others about your treachery.
There is NO excuse for what you have done to me and my friends, especially with our nearly 3-year business relationship with you.  SHAME ON YOU and actually, if this is the way you conduct business – GOOD RIDDANCE to you and your TREACHERY!
Diane King



Historical Revisionist & Prolific Videographer Jim Rizoli’s Third You Tube Channel Shut Down By Censors

Historical Revisionist & Prolific Videographer Jim Rizoli’s Third You Tube Channel Shut Down By Censors

​Jim Rizoli(right) interviews Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, July, 2016
We’d like to inform you that due to repeated or severe violations of our Community Guidelines ( your YouTube account Mr Bizzworld has been suspended.We’d like to inform you that due to repeated or severe violations of our Community Guidelines, your YouTube account has been suspended.

After review, we have determined that your account activity violated our Community Guidelines, which state that hate speech is not acceptable on our site. “Hate speech” means content that promotes hatred or violence against members of a protected group (race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, and sexual orientation/gender identity).

Please be aware that you are prohibited from accessing, possessing, or creating any other YouTube accounts. For more information about account terminations and how our Community Guidelines are enforced, please visit our Help Center.

If you would like to appeal the suspension, please submit this form.

Please be aware that you are prohibited from accessing, possessing or creating any other YouTube accounts. For more information about account terminations and how our Community Guidelines are enforced, please visit our Helper Center.

If you would like to appeal the suspension, please submit this form.